How could you recommend something you never tried?Quote:
Originally Posted by RyuChung
Printable View
How could you recommend something you never tried?Quote:
Originally Posted by RyuChung
I played COD 4 and COD 5.
I think if you cant decide buy both :P if u have the money but i would say COD 5.
If COD 4 had zombies it would be to easy because the gun on COD 4 are very overrated and strong
Cod 4 is better than cod 5 exceptt for the zombies! :laugh:Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxim26
Infinity Ward could just make the zombies a tad bit tougher..
Cod 4 all the way it owns
Call of Duty 4,
MP5 owns all
COD 4 ftw
both rock xD
i liked both even though cod 5 was a bit more difficult in MP to level up
coD5 TBH, Much better.
i just borrowed cod4 off a friend for 360, i really like it
i havent tried 5 yet tho,
but imo 4 is a really good game. :D
All i like on cod5 is the campaign but cod4 is just better of them both. Multiplayer 10x better and campaign was also good, The only reason i got COD5 is because i got the acheivements in cod4.
u have not played on a 360 they are the best ps3s are crap there are hardly no games on ps3 only racing and then the good games on ps3 are on 360 most of themQuote:
Originally Posted by Spycky
Compare some things to define your favourite...
There is no "best" or "worst" cod...there's only a diffrence in the type of game you like most.
Cod4 = Modern Warfare aka present
Cod5 = WO2 (again)
This is the first thing u look at, if u hate WO2, your choice is easy.
A few points i used to compare the games
Cod4 Cod5
Campaign Difficulty Easy Intermediate
Rank System Easy to hack Easy to bypass
Graphics OK Great
Bugs Online Few LOTS
Amount of hackers Many 90% of all players
Single Player Campaign Easy Hard(er)
I personally prefer Cod4 cus it has less bugs online...but imo..they both failed.
Cod4 was promised to be a game that would change the meaning of "First person shooter"...but in the end it was just a new version of CoD with a Rank system added that is stored on your own freaking pc, so format your pc and all your ranks, weapons, perks etc are gone.
Cod5 was supposed to be even better than cod4 (they learned from the mistakes they said) but in the end it looked more like Cod4 with enhanced graphics and a new name. The bugs multiplied by 25 and the rank system once again failed since its stored on your own pc AGAIN.
If you want to play a FPS game that will track your stats / ranks forever, stop playing CoD and move to Battlefield series (EA DOES know how to make a rank system work)
If you play it cus you like the gameplay, pick Cod4 or Cod5 based on the style of the game (Present or WO2)
My own opinion...
I have both Cod4 and Cod5. They were fun for a few weeks but after a while it gets boring and they're basically just another FPS, except for the fact that Cod4 is special cus its finally not a WO2 game.
In my opinion...cod5 failed.
CoD - World at War is better then CoD4 - Modern Warfare due to the fact you can't spray an RPD at level 1 (100 bullets aswell)
CoD - World at War is alot harder and is 10x funner then CoD4 - i must admit CoD4 is a fantastic game but I can't let go of my Bolt Action Rifles on Downlfall
I would have to agree with sutsurikeru because i mean they are both great games but in the it comes down to ones personal opinion so if u like FPS, just get both :PQuote:
Originally Posted by sutsurikeru
But COD5 ( in my Opinion) is better than COD 4 due to the fact that is WWII and the Russian campaign is insanely awesome.
Like i said, it depends on ones opinion so i say
COD 5 FTW!!!!
COD 4, I like modern warfare more than a game where you just get betty'ed and sniped.