Can't wait for the full game!
Printable View
Can't wait for the full game!
Nah, gameplay is shit. Graphics are awesome! But I think CoD4 is a better choice, gameplay is the most important thing ;).
Crysis gameplay owns balls.
I'm only getting cod4 cause of the multiplayer =)
Looks interesting, I might try it out later. Until then I'll just keep reading the comments on it.
I wish my comp would run that the graphics look super sexy LOL
My 1.5GB kingston was letting me down, though it played with no problems with all settings on High/very high. My Ballistix memory arrived today so ill be happy once thats in.
i got a e6600 @ 3 ghz
2 gig 800 mhz ram
and a pathetic x1900 gt 256 mb
but i m able to play it on ****** all high setting on 1360x768
the resolution i needed anyway to play it on my hdtv
im just ***** amazed that i m able to play it on all high setting
when i see so many ppl with 8800 cards not being able to do just that
my next card is going to be the new hd 3800 for sure now , i just cant believe it ,nvidea and crytek worked so close together for all this time and they still have crap preformace on it
definitly if u know my old x1900 gt can get the same fps then a 8800 gts lol !
RAM doesn't effect performance much. Just load times. CPU and GPU will effect game performance.
I doubt you can play it at high settings at any reasonable performance. And 15fps isn't reasonable. My 8800GTX @ Ultra speed runs the game at 40fps in those setting at 12x10 resolution and 20-25fps at very high settings.
Your weak ass GPU wont do high settings at anything over 10-15 fps if you are lucky.
Try going into the console (~) and typing in "r_displayinfo 1" that will tell you the fps of the game.
And you do know that the performance on AMD cards is worse then that of nVidia cards in this game.
NoPeace - out
well i aint lieing i m getting about 20-25 fps with everything on high (and i really mean everything)
the only thing wich i cant use at all is aa and thats only because the 256 ram on it just isent enough
and if the preformance on amd cards is worse then that of nvidia then y am i able to get better fps then a 8800 gts ....
and here taken from this thread aswel another guy with a pritty weak card able to play it on all high setting
something most 8800 gts users have troubles with
with the new beta drivers from nvidea the so called recomanded for crysis drivers 169.01? not sure
u cant even play the game on vista 64 bit .... gogo nvidea :p
i have now done the tweak to enable very high setting in xp
and omg it looks so nice! and i m still getting 10-15 fps :p
not bad at all for my weak ass card
i was planning on buying the 8800 gt this month but i m definitly waiting for the hd3800 now cause i m that surpriced about my old ati card
dident u have a x1900xtx or use to ? u should try it on crysis maybe ull have the same results as me
it raped my PC. literally. 17fps. on max (gf6600)
Only 256mb of RAM? You do know that it wont be possible to run at that resolution with high settings and get 20-25 FPS with just 256mb of RAM.
There just isn't enough memory to store the textures that are required to do that.
And you do know that in XP the GTS gets about 40 FPS at that setting...
Umm.... I'm running Vista Ultimate 64-bit with the 169.01 drivers and it runs just fine. The 64-bit version of the game doesn't work but the 32-bit does. And that's not down to the graphics drivers but a software problem with the demo that needs to be patched.
Yet again there is something wrong there. Either your drivers are setup to have the lowest possible level of detail or you are simply not running those settings and/or resolution.
I wouldn't bother getting that card. It's going to perform lower then the 8800GT. Hence why they changed the price from $250 to $200 to compete with the GT.
The GT is just simply an amazing card. No matter how you look at it.
I used to have dual x1900's. Sold them for a PS3 and went back to nVidia. Why nVidia? Because the support for games with ATI is crap compared to nVidia. Gave me to many problems. So that's why I went back to nVidia. And not to mention a single GTX is faster then dual x1900 XTXs.
Now if you are honestly running at those settings and getting those results consider yourself damn lucky. Because even the 2900Pro can't get those results. And that's a faster card then what you have.
Fact of the matter. At the moment the 8800's are the best cards around. Well the GT and the GTX as the GTS and Ultras are jokes.
NoPeace - out
sourceQuote:
Weapons and vehicles available
Crytek's Crysis demo just won't stay under our radar. After the DX10 on DX9 script issue was discovered, a number of people started to scrutinize the script files. Now, we have yet another surprise to report about.
The new surprise comes in the form of guns, including nearly everything that you will be able to view in the full game. Next in line are vehicles, tanks, boats and helicopters. All you have to do is to download the "demofunmap #5" from here, and then extract the level.pak to C:\Program Files\Electronic Arts\Crytek\Crysis SP Demo\Game\Levels\island, or whereever you installed the demo. Just be sure to back up the original level.pak so you don't have to reinstall the demo.
It seems that Crytek has underestimated gamers' curiosity and desire to look at the script files and editor. And stay off the center of the map, since it triggers the final cut scene and ends the demo. Have fun flying.....
Alright, breakthrough guys. I just found out that if you use the map editor and skip to the bit after the last cutscene theres about 30 seconds of extra gameplay, showing off the alien a bit more, but if you skip down to the bottom bit after your screen fades out a second time you'll find out something interesting about Jester.