Originally Posted by
Lazlow
You have a very biased opinion on the whole console war deal. You point out the PS3's strengths, not any of the weaknesses, and you don't mention any strengths the 360 has.
The PS3 has free internet, online membership and a half decent variety of games and it doesn't burn out as easily (because the cooling system is better) BUT the PS3 runs Blu-Ray discs slowly even though it has a faster processor than he 360 (Blu-Ray technoiogy is unreliable, a blu-ray disc needs to have data written onto it 3 times to guarantee data is on the disc), Sony have had to practically copy the whole Achievements thing to try and keep up with Microsoft.
The 360 has a wider variety of games, more exclusive games, a better online service with far more free (and paid) downloadable content than the PS3 does BUT it's loud, tends to have occasional hardware failures (most have been fixed e.g the 3 lights) and the controller is rather bulky.
I haven't read anywhere on the internet or in magazines about any spectacular PS3 games which would make me wish I never sold my PS3, so I'd say your incredibly biased opinion is a load of bollocks.
And developers failed to develop more for the PS3 because the 360 was released earlier and there was therefore a bigger market for the 360 than when the PS3 was released, so companies could generate more cash from 360 users.
And I seriously doubt your PS3 could run for 7 days straight, you'd be retarded to leave anything on for 7 days straight just to prove a point. When I had my PS3 it only took a matter of half an hour or more for alot of heat to be given off, so it's just as bad as the 360.
In some cases the 360 is more reliable than the PS3. It only took me 2-4 months for my PS3 to fail and require me to claim a new PS3 on my insurance. I've had my 360 for nearly a year and I've yet to replace it (it's a newer model, I suppose). So yeah, like I said, you're full of shit.
