Hey guys i bring to you another amazing release
https://mega.co.nz/#!Dxk2TZSR!q1ngJ7...to7E8titALJav0
Rv Guard 223 source code compiles cleanly
Printable View
Hey guys i bring to you another amazing release
https://mega.co.nz/#!Dxk2TZSR!q1ngJ7...to7E8titALJav0
Rv Guard 223 source code compiles cleanly
i love when i see this kind of thing happened :lol:
in tittle is 223, would this work for 2232 or need something else to make it work for 2232?
but is there any other info about this guard? since i don't know rv guard myself.hahahaha
lol its only 223 wont work on 2232 and about the guard not much info ive had it in my archives for along time i got it off one of the developers for RV shield before they left the scene :) ive been using it to work on my 2232 guard and add in new features to it so its great if u wanna expand a guard i also know it compiles cleanly but the licensing sytsem is still intact so you would have to bypass this or input the data needed for it license inside of the code but i know it works right out of the box as far as compiling and linking
just a question
this is serverside guard? o.O
similiar to source module in the release section?
yes it is a server side guard similar to the one seen for 2232 in this section except this one contains alot more example the guard tower and trap fix ;)
- - - Updated - - -
http://i.imgur.com/IsiHmnH.pnghttp://i.imgur.com/Yl6kdpJ.png
the bottom picture is of its licensing system that needs to be nulled.
oh, for everyone who try to compile this, this source using vs 2013 :lol:
so if you get error :
change setting by right click RvGuard_v3 project, click properties, general, platform toolset (change to your version, i used 2010 so i changed it to v100)Code:Project file contains ToolsVersion="12.0". This toolset may be unknown or missing,
what you mean by nulling?
adding /**/
on CStart::Pusk function?
i'm not a programmer, so aren't that good with it.hahahahaha
but i'm learning it little by little when i've time...
oh, more question, is this fixing crash zone from bad packet? i hate to see any server being attacked/crashed.wkwkwkkwkwkwkw
nulling as in removing the licensing system all together i dont currently have the free time to do so hence why its still inplace but it needs to be disabled if u wanna use these files and as for vs 2013 i had no issues with it. its what i was using
what fixed from this zoneserver ? duping , coordinate -1 and Auction House has fix ?
this is not zone server, this is source, you could look at it, if you can't understand what i'm saying just leave the files, don't touch it :):Quote:
Originally Posted by Agungg
What is the Difference of this and The release of vtqpb. This release fix Crash server?
There are no real "fixes" in this. Just the source which has been passed around from Russian forums.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Interview
All of the sources with the fixes you're wanting are mostly private still.
Where copyright? RF-Cheats share the FlyGirl
It does not work half is shell
Quote:
And now a "gift" for those who will be, or he uses the juzat def.
We take and send the package to the trade, with the index of the character 4032 and the server will fall because of the array g_Player targeted at 4032 players and indexing goes from 0 to 4031. Hence we get the flight out of the array, hence all the charm and exceptions and a server crash
flygirl is zaglumilo i believe? o.OQuote:
Originally Posted by RuLex1
not so sure what are you talking about 4032 array,
aren't 0 to 4031 is alredy correct? o.O
in 223 CPlayer seem to have 4032 array total, and 2532 in 2232...
was hoping any release about clientside T_T
serverside is missing the clientside, network encryption doesnt work T_T
Copyright? The name in itself tells who the owner is.Quote:
Originally Posted by RuLex1
he might mean about credit for releasing it xDQuote:
Originally Posted by Ron
but the owner is yeah, rv-shield.hahahaha
beside i'm not so sure either, zaglumilo perhaps part of rv shield team before...
not sure about it...
I don't really know who made it honestly, or who is part of the team. I don't go on the russian RF boards anymore.Quote:
Originally Posted by likertuban
Hmm soo Zaglumilo is part of RV-Shield.Quote:
Originally Posted by likertuban
Do they have a link to a project page anywhere on the Russian forums? From my understanding the source was leaked by someone. I didn't know they actually released it anywhere.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Interview
i couldn't say that, because i dont know about it myself...Quote:
Originally Posted by The Interview
if i'm not wrong, fedor is the only one working on rv-shield before he create dev-corp,Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron
he leave, because he is the only one working in it,
and if i'm not wrong, the team project sell the source, and then it released in rusian forum, but the thread is deleted (CMIIW)
and now it's released here,
we got 2232 source with a lot of think that not working,
but it doesnt have licensing system, and was a good for base, to write your own module (in my own opinion)
and we got 223 version with a lot of crap function such as shutdown your server PC, disable potion, money, etc
and it even disabling the recall potion, and also disabling the macro, so i couldn't say it's fixing, but it's disabling the function xD
and also 223 have licensing system...
so for people who dont know the code/doesnt want to learn,
and only able to compile and run, that would fucked up their server xD
i saw someone using this Source - RF Leviathan and it looks fine.Quote:
Originally Posted by likertuban
Interesting. So they released it themselves at one point, then deleted it?
No wonder the source is missing a lot. If it got leaked it wouldn't have so many missing functions.
i dont know, rf leviathan might know how to code, and disabling the licensing system and all bad system,Quote:
Originally Posted by The Interview
as i said, if you cant code, then you are messed up...
or perhaps they are officially have license on this module before the source get leaked...
ummm, i think moderator on that russian forum delete it, not the one who release it, not sure tho'Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron
can't confirm this...
i just remember i've read it somewhere...
well, this is V3, so perhaps the missing function is a part where it's a "fast fix", to avoid bad thing from happening, while correcting the bug, they disabled it for a moment...
so when the fix is ready, they got V4 or next module version, not sure tho'
it's just my theory..
I already ask fedor about this. But he said he's alone on RV-ShieldQuote:
Originally Posted by likertuban
Spoiler:
not so sure anymore then...
because i only heard that it was a team project, but fedor do everything...
that is why he leave the team, because he's the only one who is working,
but again, i'm not so sure, because it's just a rumor...
On your opinion which is more better, RV Source or 2.2.3.2 GU sourceQuote:
Originally Posted by likertuban
in my own opinion, my module is much better then both :P:learn coding, and you should know...both is for different version, so it's not correct way to compare both, and i already give my opinion for both source, read above comment -_-"Quote:
Originally Posted by The Interview
Hmm :) Im still newbie in programmer and hope to learn on how to code :)Quote:
Originally Posted by likertuban
Probably got tired of RF. Everyone does eventually. :)
Too many want to release a perfect files here. But yea leachers is sneaking around haha. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron
Oh well. RZ is all about sharing files anyway. More people leeching files = more interest in a game = better developers getting interested in the game.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Interview
Its a win for everyone.
i actually disabled the licensing system in rv guard so it is completely bypassed
On this source ?Quote:
Originally Posted by UniverseGaming
Yes. Just comment out the lines which call the licensing system. Easy for anyone with basic coding skills.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Interview
@likertuban
You mean this ?
system("shutdown /s");
- - - Updated - - -
and can you try this Lik. http://www.mediafire.com/download/gndbcuylj5h4r9y/RvGuard_v3.dll if i succeed commenting out the license.
yes...
it's just a command to shutdown your server computer, there's another, and lot of them ^^7
Btw name your Folder = Tshield_System
@likertuban
What's this
Spoiler:
to disable to licensing system all u have to do is look under dllmain.cpp
bool GetHW_Info()
{
char serialNumber[1024];
get_drive_serial_number( "C:", serialNumber );
if( !stricmp(RSA_Decrypt( 0 ), serialNumber) )
{
return true;
}
return false;
replace with the following
bool GetHW_Info()
{
char serialNumber[1024];
get_drive_serial_number( "C:", serialNumber );
if( !stricmp(RSA_Decrypt( 0 ), serialNumber) )
{
return true;
}
return true;
- - - Updated - - -
all of these i removed in my private versionQuote:
Originally Posted by The Interview
they was some bs crap put in by the rv shield team
How completely lifted License????
I did it deleting those License .CPPQuote:
Originally Posted by sadi
- - - Updated - - -
There's too many Useless .CPP there. and it contains License System only.Quote:
Originally Posted by sadi
Best to ctrl + H, then search and replace "system("shutdown /s");" with "//system("shutdown /s");". It'll prevent the guard from ever shutting down your system.
0 05/26/15 10:39:34: Closed Port:27700,Not Host Connect.
Because of the emergence of this
I can not be practical in the
i think that is part of the licensing system ^^7Quote:
Originally Posted by sadi
not sure tho'
not looked at it yet...
sirQuote:
Originally Posted by likertuban
How can I prohibit license?
are u guys blind i posted how to bypass the license system above -.-
- - - Updated - - -
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Interview
you are aware by deleting this u may not be able to compile to disable the license system i posted above in the thread how to disarm it without damaging any of the code
- - - Updated - - -
this guard is running perfectly fine on my test server and my friends server if they disable the license in my post stated above they wouldnt have a problem the issue here is people cant read.Quote:
Originally Posted by likertuban
- - - Updated - - -
incase anyone missed this post on how to disable the license here it is againQuote:
Originally Posted by UniverseGaming
well, if it's work for you not sure then, but just for your information, GetHW_Info is not the only license in it ^^7Quote:
Originally Posted by UniverseGaming
not sure if you accidently disable the other one too (perhaps because debug mode, not sure tho'), or your friend disabled it...
or it's actually work only using that way (but i'm sure it wont work only that way, because the one that disable port/ClientLineAnalysis still exist in it)...
^^7
well, if you not understand what ClientLineAnalysis i'm talking about, dont bother to replay me ^^7
i dont need to disabled it because i already create my own...
and i will watching if people able to manage to "learn" themself...
that is the reason i'm not helping on disabling the license yet...
i want to see you guys trying and learning,...
oh, also, you have to worry about setitemeffect bug in 223,
i've been tested on 223, and give lot of dodge, acuracy, attack, and deff, etc ^^7
i know how you feel bro ^^7Quote:
Originally Posted by sadi
i think there's an easier method tho'...
but i delete all of the licensing system on this v3 source already including all the pointless cpp, and create my own dllmain.cpp
so...
yeah, couldnt say it, because mine is a clean without any licensing crap ^^7
and not using this licenshit system...
^^7
and sorry, can't share it at the moment, i will waiting for all of you to learn about it rather than spoon feed everyone...
the source and the code is right over there...
it just you guys have to learn about it...
^^7
Yea like what i did too. :) This UniverseGaming Guy, Always doing pro moves :PQuote:
Originally Posted by likertuban
were you even able to disable the license?Quote:
Originally Posted by The Interview
as universegaming said, just deleting will cause error...
it's different if you create your own dllmain.cpp o.O
or you modified a lot lot of it...
It should look like this
bool GetHW_Info()
{
return true;
}
or delete the whole method and remove the if statement where the method was used.
lol xcct u dont have to remove the whole function u can just set them all to true and does the same exact thing. as long as the end result says true either way. just easyer for these guys to do increase of deleting code because they arent coders and would most likely break the entire thing by taking out the entire if statement or function so just chaning both return's to true would be easyer for them. but yes your method works as well but for someone who doesnt know what they are doing can cause alot more problems if they break the sytaxing
- - - Updated - - -
@ likertuban the bool GetHW_Info() tells the licesning system if the hardware id matchs the one in the license key file so if it doesnt it reports false if it does it reports true so making the ending result report true even if it doesnt match still keeps the "license" enabled. without needing to really disable the licensing system
The best way to do this is to remove the licensing code completely rather than null it. Cleaner code = better.
No reason to compile code that isn't being used. That is just poor programming technique. It's much easier to remove the entire function because you are just setting it to return true anyway.
eh maybe so but i have reasons of my own for leaving it intact. i mean yes what you say is completely true if u dont plan on using it for something later down the road.
The only reason anyone would not remove the code is if they were wanting to re-implement it with their own licensing in the future. I guess you're saying you plan to do that?Quote:
Originally Posted by UniverseGaming
maybe im still debating on releasing it full as public. with the way people are acting including the forum mod here i may not release it as full. so if i reimplement if all depends on how people here decide to treat each other the forum mod talking shit constantly saying stuff people have releaases is stolen or that a module claimed to be self coded was stolen from someone else or that his module is better then everyone elses cuz he has pt's working in his so everyone elses must be stolen just because we havent found out how he did his yet is really making me think twice about releasing my copy as full. worst case ill release a deactived license copy as free with some minor new modules put in and then rearm the license and my major modules in place.
that is what i said you dont understand clientlineanalysis i'm talking about ^^7Quote:
Originally Posted by UniverseGaming
do you think rv-shield, just check hardware id?
nay, if that is the case, everyone doesnt need to renew the license as long as the hardware is same...
but it seem that license is disabled in debug mode CMIIW...
rofl dude you are ignorant then tell me why did i just recompile and run it on my local server with no issues what so ever why is it in use at RF leviathan and still no issues? plz talk what you know and stop talking out of ur ass. thanks and i dont compile in debug more and if u read the code the license is in a file stored with the zonguard
Code:void FileString()
{
FILE* GTDat;
GTDat=fopen(".\\Rv_System\\license.rvdat","rb");
if( GTDat!=NULL)
{
fread(&License,sizeof(license),1,GTDat);
fclose(GTDat);
}
}
maybe you should read the source better before speaking? because clearly here is where the license data is stored not offsite.
as i said, it (the other licensing system) is disabled on debug mode...
and the first time i try to build rv_shield, seem it's into debug mode as a prove, it's put into debug folder instead release folder ^^7
you really didnt read it after all...
^^7
ive never compiled it in debug mode ever and ive never had a problem.
- - - Updated - - -
so no idea what problems they have but ive never once had a single issue with it and ive completely nulled the licensing system. if ppl follow the instructions i put in place in this thread they should be able to compile and run it with no problems what so ever
by default it was debug mode compile,
well, go read the code then, and you will know what i mean...
that is why i hate to debating code with you,
because you will just say it doesnt happened to you ^^7
or something else...
it's just like WriteInstruction function we are debating before, i explained it to you, and you said i was just saying theory,
and then i send you the picture including the explanation...
i dont want to do that anymore, up2you if you going to believe me or not,
but if checking hardware is enough that way, then it's not necessary to renew your licensing as long your hard ware id is the same...
the fact that rv-shield client require renewal license, already a proof of another existence of it's license...
it's just disabled in debug mode that is all there's to it...
i wont replay regarding this matter anymore either...
i at least already said and explain what the people problem is, instead saying you have no idea what people problem is, and no, this is not just theory,...
everything i said is based on the code based on what you call "reading"
people might use dll on release folder instead of debug folder tho'
there's a dll in release folder, and that dll still have all the licensing system in it...
will watch people figure it out theirself ^^7
ya but im just confused on what problem they are having because i compiled it in release mode and disabled the hwid check as stated above and the guard functions perfectly fine its currenrly in use on a live server right now at rf levi and its been active there for well over 2 weeks and to this day no problems with it. i just dont see what your talking about because everything i posted here ive done myself and it works perfectly o.o im not arguring just pointing out there problems must be something else because if its what you say levi and i would be having the same exact issue and we arent.
and its not a theory its a fact. and its a proven fact because its running on a live server right now for the past few weeks.
Thread closed. content removed due to OP throwing a hissy.
reopened. Op is putting info back. please, no more rubbish...
Thread reopened and link reposted as situation as been resolved
Not sure what you two are arguing about. Just remove the functions, or if you're lazy, make the license functions return true.
// pseudocode
bool LicenseCheck()
{
return true;
}
End of argument.
hehe ron yes im lazy mhm :p
I smell fishy :w00t:Quote:
Originally Posted by UniverseGaming
Do i need to add this or This code already exist on source.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron
private files is still private files. that's is what im talking about.
this RF Community has become worst community. steal and copying people work like a Child. and share it like a Boss.
some people just want to be popular with the work of others...
Please Respect to RVShield Developer who made it from scratch
i do agree about copying like a child and share it like a Boss ^^7Quote:
Originally Posted by ROSLAW
but sharing is caring...
that is why this forum never against leaked files, otherwise there's never serverfiles to begin with ^^7
with module shared, at least the community have a chance to advance their knowledge and do more advance thing, even the leecher number is more than the real developer number in rf nowadays...
beside, this module bug is a lot too...
even loot system is messed up, if try to loot, it would give error all the time, also WPE hole because no one really look at the function carefully...
i'm impressed on people who use this module just by disabling the hardware check (without fixing bug, etc) and manage to run this module without any problem...
not sure if they turned off all of the module function/feature...
^^7
I'm talking about private files, not public files (leaked or not is not important), and this is not about they can use it or not.
Private files is file/app/program made/created by someone.
the only one can share it is just the owner or someone who have permission from the owner.
this is just my opinion....
Imagine if you making some program and share it to someone to help you finish your program. but he shared your source code on public without your permission. how do you feel about that?.
that is true, and that is what it means by leaked files...Quote:
Originally Posted by ROSLAW
sure, i know owner would be hurt, same goes for CCR, their serverfiles get shared/distributed freely and of course that serverfiles is not mean for public in the first place...
imagine how hurt they were, furthermore they are the creator of this game, and they have to spent a lot of budget to create the game...
and also imagining Lyto spent a lot of money for this game contract each month/year?
and we got it free here and we can create server as much as we want...
above is my opinion tho'
if it's private files, it should be keep private by owner and shouldnt be shared anyone no matter what in the first place, that is also my opinion...
^^7
You talking about official files leaked. but official files leaked is not same with private files stolen, it is different case....
and then you comparing files with source code?.
Leaked is not same with Stolen dude... ^^7
Now I know the reason why this RF Section has become grave for new information :).
But yeah it's oke, I know what you mean... no problem ^^7, I think I can't blame this forum or you, this is your place, I will blame my self why I'm in here and talking with someone who thinking if leaked files is same with stolen files. .and comparing it with official files. :). and thinking it is same @_@.
So do not blame the developer or someone to prefer distributed their file and sell it, than shared their knowledge in here. ^^7.
oh, just confirming something, it's not only happened on rf online section, all stolen, leaked, is happening on every section ^^7Quote:
Originally Posted by ROSLAW
also, sharing is caring :):
it's personal decision to sell, or to share, but of course we encourage sharing, as contribution to the community because without the community, there will be never a free shared serverfiles in the firstplace, and there will be no project like module, tools, etc...
^^7
and as far as i know, there's no rules against stolen/leaked files, another mod once asked mental, and mental said sharing is caring...
it's going to be off topic now tho'
no, I have in here for long time. and I looking Ran online, Seal Online, SMPT GTA, Rose Online and Others forum section. no one on there is like in here.
There is not have stolen files. just leaked from official. and all people on there can respect other people work.
if they found some stolen files, they will hit it in the face the people who share it.
almost member on there know how to respect other people works, because they know so hard to making some program from scratch.
People can freely share their work and discuss about it without worry if someone will hit his back, so they no need to stole anything. that is why stolen file do not exist on there. ^^7
All member given contribution and work together.
Yes Sharing is caring. but in this section Stolen is caring. ^^7.
- - - Updated - - -
Example like your thread : https://forum.ragezone.com/f479/rele...-code-1066082/
For me, that is good topic, good info, and good work, you shared your knowledge and asking about some process you can't finish, that is enough to trigger discussion.
but like you see. there is just me and you who discuss in your thread, just me and you who interest about it, no one care to increase their knowledge again, in here they just care how to use it, how to sell it, how to modified it. no one care how to make it with their own brains.
people just want instant way.
if they can, they will asking everything from you, drain your knowledge like maggot, and after they got all information, they will hit your back. then act like they can do it by their self without given any contribution to you. they will hit you at your ass. and acting like a Developer.
:w00t:
hahahaha,Quote:
Originally Posted by ROSLAW
that is true,
but since i'm also a mod in infestation/war z section, over there, a lot lot lot of stolen files, almost there's always report everyday about their project getting stolen...
and worsely, they stole each other because they hate the owner, or because they like it, so lets stole more and share ^^7
well, guess each section have it's own problem...
and rf online problem, just as you describe, people only want instant one...
but still, sadly, i didnt see any rules about stolen files, at least not at the moment, you might can confirm this to mental directly tho'
because different mod seem to have different opinion regarding this matter...
Oke. you can see, every section when have stolen files between each others, never grow up and stuck. :)
Oke Mr. LikerTuban, at Least thank you for hearing my complain :).
let we see, how this RF Section grow up ^^7.
and Sorry if I'm out off Topic :)
I need to work again :)
As according to me
Everthing Come From Others Works ,
Actually We never had files automatically when RF Online had started .
So technically that means some one shared the files , because he cared ...
So if we have someone else works , we can too share to others that who may be looking for a long time , and to help and care them
but we should still credit for the real source ..
And ye Likertuban Sharing Is Caring ...
I compactei to work however no effect even I LICENSE disabling it does not work ... I can still use fly hacker bug map etc ... I took the job that vpqtb susbistitui posted and the DLL and does not work any protection .. . what should I do?
think this could be used on older versions?
only works on 223
you have to rewrite everything if you want to use this on older version...Quote:
Originally Posted by Merritt
especially class, function, and the address :P:
the class and struct would be the most pain in the ass :P:
as long as class is done, function and address would be easily finded using 216 (you have to look serverfiles with PDB)
bool GetHW_Info()
{
char serialNumber[1024];
get_drive_serial_number( "C:", serialNumber );
if( !stricmp(RSA_Decrypt( 0 ), serialNumber) )
{
return true;
}
return true;
I use this method and this error happens
0 08/12/15 20:37:26: Closed Port:27700,Not Host Connect. >>>> Help-me pls
How to make this source in to Zone server Application and the Modules also.
This is not ZonServer, This is a Extension for ZoneServer. You need to hook the Extension to ZoneServer.exeQuote:
Originally Posted by Alysson
- - - Updated - - -
Are you using Visual Studio Ultimate 2013?Quote:
Originally Posted by Clebson da Sul
use bool GetHW_Info()Quote:
Originally Posted by Clebson da Sul
{
char serialNumber[1024];
get_drive_serial_number( "C:", serialNumber );
if( !stricmp(RSA_Decrypt( 0 ), serialNumber) )
{
return false;
}
return false;
I'm using visual 2010 as indicated likertuban ... Copilar the dll and when I open the server in inside the RV-system folder opens a folder "license" and the error occurs 0 08/12/15 20:37:26: Closed Port: 27700, Not Host Connect will try the method of
return false;
}
return false;
and I speak here the result .... Thank you all for the help: D
- - - Updated - - -
When the file with copilar
return false;
}
return false;
The server opens and I can log ... however none of protection works ....
can any one give me this gameguard that can be use in server already?
sigh~
does no one figure it out and want to share how to bypass this license check which is so simple -_-
i'll leave the clue, look on debug mode, and compare it with release mode, you should figure it out already, in fact it's so simple to bypass the license, and what i said about the existence the second license is true, disabling hardware check is not the only thing you need, but no one believe me after all -_-
liker disabaling hardware check is all i did and it runs perfectly fine....... no other steps are required o.o so what is it your going on about?
are you sure? does the fly hack fix working?Quote:
Originally Posted by UniverseGaming
chat/command is not part of protection...
there are a few ways as far i remmeber. 1. get the test license that enables everything 2. remove the valdiations 3. modify the validation and just return true.
ya thats all i did was making validation of the hardware id to always say that it sees the existing license in the file and liker everything is operational except for flyhack but thats because the xyz coords arent being calculated properly the formula is broken smart one. my method of bypassing the licence check is just simply making it say that it sees theres a existing licence and to continue simple as that and yes ive confirmed everything works except flyhack as say above plus ive made more adjustments to mine and more addons ;) including guildcrash which wasnt included so ha
nay, that's not true, fly hack fix is working, it's already in it, because i'm used it right now...Quote:
Originally Posted by UniverseGaming
:):
not according to roslaw and priceray both have confirmed flyhack module isnt working due to miscalculated xyz coords i have my entire guard working everything except for flyhacking i even got the -1 coord dupe patch working xD
Quote:
Originally Posted by likertuban
yes this is not working to prevent any posible flyhack and have miscalculated xyz (Speed hack and Fly Hack terrain).Quote:
Originally Posted by UniverseGaming
CanYouGoThere Function originaly is used for Monster Object, but this function can be used also for character object.
when the object calling CanYouGoThere function, this function will call some stack/value from Map Class to make the object always near with another object (wall, terrain, floor, and others) ...
that is different with map XYZ coordinate calculation to make the object always back to original coordinate . :)
I do not need to explain it more... :), if you think that is enough to prevent flyhack so go ahead :),
and don't compare me with princeray, I am not a child.
I think i understand what you mean, but it's working even tho' it's not complete for 223 in my opinion, sad i cant check it anymore since my laptop broke 1 week agoQuote:
Originally Posted by ROSLAW
yes I agree if canyougothere function at this source is work completely, honestly that is not enough to block all possible way to doing FlyHack.Quote:
Originally Posted by likertuban
I just talking if this source have miscalculated xyz. because the code itself is not complete. (but this is not my point).
* the point is : That guy has pretend that I gave him wrong information lol. :junglejane:
Ah, yeah, i got your point, so it's confirmed, the fly or at least map glitch fix is working, n if he said it didnt work, we know already the problem is in his source :lol:
ya but the problem isnt the license bypass ;)
Are you sure? On rv3 if you bug map glitch, you will rolled back, did that happened to you?Quote:
Originally Posted by UniverseGaming
And which one you used to bypass it?
Return true? Or return false?
Have you test lv cheat for guard tower?
Does lv cheat for tower work?
That is simple test to check if your protection fully working, that alone prove if your protection really working or not
yes the guard tower one is working i did test that as i said the only thing that fails is the flyhack. when using the bypass u use false it tells the guard that the hardware id was found in the file even tho it wasnt then it goes to loading the modules as objects the wat it the flow works is
check license->if license matchs continue-> load modules
the fact that i told the guard to always continue even if license isnt found means all the modules load the code in the modules doesnt look for a license. so once the license is bypassed all the modules get loaded in.
the license it self isnt checked inside the modules them selfs there for doesnt affect modules indiviually