Arcturus Decompiled Source - Arcturus Jar Dumper

Hello all,

Since Arcturus is "closed source" and "account protected", I release this.

Just need rebuild emulator project (Netbeans or Eclipse) :sleep:

You can run the arcturus.jar without the stupid launcher, java -jar arcturus.jar

Source : http://habbo.bi/arcturus_source.zip

Maven pom.xml : [XML] pom.xml - Pastebin.com (useful if you want fix & rebuild source)

Original jar : http://habbo.bi/arcturus.jar

Dumper : [JavaScript] Arcturus Dumper - Pastebin.com (written in NodeJS, you know I love NodeJS)

Screenshot (clean source) :
https://i.gyazo.com/47a7fcf367c55a46...a80452d037.png

And @SofoEB found a backdoor, here :
https://i.gyazo.com/0d7048df67c1651a...b04dd0da51.png

that was... uhm.. quick..

Fast man haha

I can't believe my eyes, a backdoor?.. really

@vista4life I've made cookies, you wanna come over?

Back on-topic: I really hope those who still think its a good idea to add backdoors in their servers sees why it is a bad idea. It will at one point sooner or later be discovered. Especially when many people are using the software. I remember some people pointed out the disabled exploit in bfly once it was leaked. The reason why I disabled it was that I did not want to get up 3AM just because some idiot had managed to get hold of one of the executables and managed to decompile it and find the exploit. Just think about how much damage this could have done if this was a popular emulator and the exploit was known at a far later stage.

I can see there are many things that can be greatly improved in the source code after briefly going through it. Empty catch-blocks is one thing, but long files that registers packets that can be eliminated by the use of annotations and class-loaders is another. But there is a lot of code here I don't consider as good, but much of it is ok. That being said, error and exception-handling in general can be greatly improved (What is the point of having logging framework when you're not even using them???).

My first impressions:
+ There are very few blobs
+ Nice oo and well-structured class hierarchies and packages
- Why the exploits
- Having actions that sends messages to certain users (due to whatever) is kinda unprofessional
- Hairy SQL statements
- Poor exception handling, SQL connection usage can be simplified by try-with-resource
- Package registers can be simplified by using annotations

Nice, now everyone know that The General aka Wesley is not trusted.

He was working on this since 2014 untill now and within 24 hours the source is decompiled.

Shame on you Wesley, you always was saying no one can decompile it. You have now two options: Stop with this project, or continue with open source. Because no one is gonna trust you anymore with a closed source.

Wesley you are a liar you renamed pixeltime emu and editted all names and shit idiot you're a noob stealing someone elses code

This is the Maven pom.xml, useful if you want rebuild project : [XML] pom.xml - Pastebin.com

~wiggle
Ready, set, go! Wesley is now marked "untrusted" in my book, lmao.
Anyways, gg. Nicely done, Burak :}

- - - Updated - - -

Code:

---

C:\Users\admin\Downloads\arcturus_source\file_source_from_cfr\com\eu\habbo\habbohotel\commands\ShoutCommand.java:
  20  public class ShoutCommand
  21  extends Command {
  22:    private static String idea = "Kudo's To Droppy for this idea!";
  23 
  24      public ShoutCommand() {

C:\Users\admin\Downloads\arcturus_source\file_source_from_cfr\com\eu\habbo\habbohotel\users\Habbo.java:
  113          Emulator.getGameEnvironment().getRoomManager().loadRoomsForHabbo(this);
  114          Emulator.getLogging().logUserLine(this.habboInfo.getUsername() + " logged in. IP: " + this.client.getChannel().remoteAddress().toString());
  115:        if (this.getHabboInfo().getUsername().equalsIgnoreCase("sir jamal") || this.getHabboInfo().getUsername().equalsIgnoreCase("dominicus") || this.getHabboInfo().getUsername().equalsIgnoreCase("droppy")) {
  116              String[] message = new String[]{"ready to get raped???", "potato", "Arcturus is love, Arcuturus is life", "Welcome to Azure 3.0. Just kidding, it's Arcturus. This emulator actually works."};
  117              int random = Emulator.getRandom().nextInt(message.length);

C:\Users\admin\Downloads\arcturus_source\file_source_from_cfr\com\eu\habbo\messages\outgoing\unknown\SnowWarsCompose1.java:
  35          this.response.appendInt32(10);
  36          this.response.appendInt32(2);
  37:        this.response.appendString("Droppy");
  38          this.response.appendString("ca-1807-64.lg-275-78.hd-3093-1.hr-802-42.ch-3110-65-62.fa-1211-62");
  39          this.response.appendString("m");

C:\Users\admin\Downloads\arcturus_source\file_source_from_cfr\com\eu\habbo\messages\outgoing\unknown\SnowWarsLevelDataComposer.java:
  21          this.response.appendInt32(1);
  22          this.response.appendInt32(1);
  23:        this.response.appendString("Droppy");
  24          this.response.appendString("ca-1807-64.lg-275-78.hd-3093-1.hr-802-42.ch-3110-65-62.fa-1211-62");
  25          this.response.appendString("m");

C:\Users\admin\Downloads\arcturus_source\file_source_from_cfr\com\eu\habbo\messages\outgoing\unknown\SnowWarsQuickJoinComposer.java:
  29          this.response.appendInt32(0);
  30          this.response.appendInt32(2);
  31:        this.response.appendString("Droppy");
  32          this.response.appendString("ca-1807-64.lg-275-78.hd-3093-1.hr-802-42.ch-3110-65-62.fa-1211-62");
  33          this.response.appendString("m");

C:\Users\admin\Downloads\arcturus_source\file_source_from_cfr\com\eu\habbo\messages\outgoing\unknown\SnowWarsUserEnteredArenaComposer.java:
  25          } else {
  26              this.response.appendInt32(0);
  27:            this.response.appendString("Droppy");
  28              this.response.appendString("ca-1807-64.lg-275-78.hd-3093-1.hr-802-42.ch-3110-65-62.fa-1211-62");
  29              this.response.appendString("m");

---

Hm.. At least he's crediting people, eh'? @Droppy

Give a man a finger and he takes your whole hand.

See this is exactly whats wrong with this community, cannot stand the fact something is closed source and needs to be open sourced.

It would've been open sourced anyways once it gets done trough alpha.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maritnmine

@vista4life I've made cookies, you wanna come over?

Back on-topic: I really hope those who still think its a good idea to add backdoors in their servers sees why it is a bad idea. It will at one point sooner or later be discovered. Especially when many people are using the software. I remember some people pointed out the disabled exploit in bfly once it was leaked. The reason why I disabled it was that I did not want to get up 3AM just because some idiot had managed to get hold of one of the executables and managed to decompile it and find the exploit. Just think about how much damage this could have done if this was a popular emulator and the exploit was known at a far later stage.

I can see there are many things that can be greatly improved in the source code after briefly going through it. Empty catch-blocks is one thing, but long files that registers packets that can be eliminated by the use of annotations and class-loaders is another. But there is a lot of code here I don't consider as good, but much of it is ok. That being said, error and exception-handling in general can be greatly improved (What is the point of having logging framework when you're not even using them???).

My first impressions:
+ There are very few blobs
+ Nice oo and well-structured class hierarchies and packages
- Why the exploits
- Having actions that sends messages to certain users (due to whatever) is kinda unprofessional
- Hairy SQL statements
- Poor exception handling, SQL connection usage can be simplified by try-with-resource
- Package registers can be simplified by using annotations

---

Funny how all I get shit now.

Thing is, that RCON message was intended for being used to update plugins.

Have you seen being it abused by me? Ofcourse not.

And good job for proving my point that this community always needs the sources because they're o so great coders.

This is going to get fucked up by people that think they can code.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The General

Give a man a finger and he takes your whole hand.

See this is exactly whats wrong with this community, cannot stand the fact something is closed source and needs to be open sourced.

It would've been open sourced anyways once it gets done trough alpha.



Funny how all I get shit now.

Thing is, that RCON message was intended for being used to update plugins.

> 1. Have you seen being it abused by me? Ofcourse not.

And good job for proving my point that this community always needs the sources because they're o so great coders.

> 2. This is going to get fucked up by people that think they can code.

---

@1. No, of course we haven't. You released it yesterday, m8.
@2. People like yourself? I mean like, it's decent, but not "i am best engineer ever" code.

I already knew making Java closed-source is like putting a small fence to defend you against a wrestler. It's just completely useless. Should've at least tried a bit harder to prevent it, but well, it's not my problem. At the other hand the community has to be really sad to 'decompile it and release it'.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Glaceon

I already knew making Java closed-source is like putting a small fence to defend you against a wrestler. It's just completely useless. Should've at least tried a bit harder to prevent it, but well, it's not my problem. At the other hand the community has to be really sad to 'decompile it and release it'.

---

Don't you understand how important it is to put your own credits in the :about menu?

And it was temporary, hence why I called it specifically 'Alpha'.

But BurakDev has big balls he wants to showoff.

- - - Updated - - -

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dominic

@1. No, of course we haven't. You released it yesterday, m8.
@2. People like yourself? I mean like, it's decent, but not "i am best engineer ever" code.

---

Oh tell me Mr. Rocket scientist how this code is shit.

I must agree with TheGeneral. Instead of start lynching him and spreading hate people could better first listen to his part of the story before getting angry. I think this is disrespectful for sure and mostly result that people don't release things anymore.

And also this would disrupt the whole development. There's a reason it's called "Alpha", still under development. Also respect this. A big problem would be that code destructors will release their versions of the server and in the most cases the code goes against the code patterns and causing memory leaks if they extend with features but that is more important then the performance.

So the conclusion is that give TheGeneral time to finish all parts of the development and documentate his project well that people can continue after. Otherwise you get "Butterfly" and crappy edits like "Bcstorm" for example if you understand what I mean. And as community we are stronger to do great things then alone. If everyone does their own thing and don't co-operate you get nowhere. Thanks!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by streamhotel

I must agree with TheGeneral. Instead of start linching him and spreading hate people could better listen to his part of the story before getting angry.

---

No no. You leave out a big part already.

They just want the source so they can modify it. In other words rename and make it fubar.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The General

No no. You leave out a big part already.

They just want the source so they can modify it. In other words rename and make it fubar.

---

What did you make?
make this project open source without authentifation ?
or stop rhis project nowV

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Juicex3

What did you make?
make this project open source without authentifation ?
or stop rhis project nowV

---

If you don't like it, use something else. There are plenty of alternatives.

It isn't mandatory to build something and release the source with it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The General

Don't you understand how important it is to put your own credits in the :about menu?

And it was temporary, hence why I called it specifically 'Alpha'.

But BurakDev has big balls he wants to showoff.

- - - Updated - - -



Oh tell me Mr. Rocket scientist how this code is shit.

---

I never said "shit", but your imbecile brain is too used to be told everything of yours is shit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dominic

I never said "shit", but your imbecile brain is too used to be told everything of yours is shit.

---

"Everything of yours is shit" well we're still happy that you made a big succes with Azure. We've never seen anything good from you except shit. You always post hate and shit comments about Wes, but you even didn't do anything except shitty Azure biggest failure ever.

So Dominic, when you wanna be a real men, start developing your own emulator from scratch right now. I can't wait till it's done and such detailled and strong as Arcturus. Until the day you didn't do this, stop posting shit comment and look at yourself in the mirror. You're just a keyboard-warrior.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The General

And good job for proving my point that this community always needs the sources because they're o so great coders.

---

Is this really so hard to understand? You are posting a closed source emulator in a community that specialize in reverse engineering. When you post a closed source emulator that you have made people very excited about, it is going to be obvious that at least a handful of people start trying to take things apart.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maritnmine

Is this really so hard to understand? You are posting a closed source emulator in a community that specialize in reverse engineering. When you post a closed source emulator that you have made people very excited about, it is going to be obvious that at least a handful of people start trying to take things apart.

---

Or people shouldn't cry that much. Its free and there are plenty of alternatives. Just accept it that it isn't open source and deal with it. It works and support is given when requested. I could've also just kept it private and then I would've gotten the same shit storm anyways.

People take things out of context and don't want to listen. All they care is about being able to read the source without them even understanding whats happening in there.

If The General didn't put backdoors in this and the source was decompiled I'd call it disrespect, but because there is a backdoor, this release serves as a consequence.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Quackster

If The General didn't put backdoors in this and the source was decompiled I'd call it disrespect, but because there is a backdoor, this release serves as a consequence.

---

There is no backdoor you fool. Learn to read, it is going to be used to runtime update plugins.

You think I'd exploit that shit? You think I want to loose people's trust over a virtual game?

Grow up Alex and shut your mouth.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The General

Or people shouldn't cry that much. Its free and there are plenty of alternatives. Just accept it that it isn't open source and deal with it.

---

Reality hurts, doesn't it? :^)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The General

Learn to read, it is going to be used to runtime update plugins.

---

Obviously I know how to read, but can you elaborate on that feature?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Quackster

Obviously I know how to read, but can you elaborate on that feature?

---

Runtime updating of plugins. It does exactly what it says on the tin. Not implemented yet and would've been fully optional.

Also you can easily block the IP out if you don't trust it or only bind RCON locally.

It's a nice release, but how you feel if someone release your "private" (<- decompile) content?
I think you'll feel really bad. You spent more then 6 months and finally it getting released and decompiled.

I never thought that the ragezone Habbo community is like kids. God damn, if you need that......
- Kylon

@The General His right the retro community is fucked up
And this is sad for him because he works alot for this and these guys are publish his many work i dont like that.
Why you dont ask it first to @The General and then you release it.

Give some respect to @The General because he made this for us.

And everyone wants to know why this community is fucked... Here you go kids a prime example as to why its fucked,
Something good gets released and ayup some one fucks it up (Y) GG
Who really gives a shit if you don't have the source i mean really...

A lot of us used Phx and did not have the source did you idiots cry about it no... you PAID for it
something free gets released and has a closed source and its source is released and the point of it is?
so noobs can throw a licence in it and try n sell it...

and this (so called exploit) really the dude works on the emu for 1 and a half years and clearly he knew some tool was gonna crack it open
so why would he add an exploit,

Holy crap this section is really fucked for real.
I'm done -.-

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The General

Runtime updating of plugins. It does exactly what it says on the tin. Not implemented yet and would've been fully optional.

Also you can easily block the IP out if you don't trust it or only bind RCON locally.

---

The source release probably comes as no real surprise to you.

Anyway, if people still trust you (and forget about the backdoor - that was certainly only meant to exist for plugin updates *cough*) they'll go with the original because of updates and shit.

Btw: Instead of telling everyone that the server code would be raped by forks if it was Open Source, couldn't you just admit that you want to remain in control (which is obviously the case - completely understand that)? Nevertheless it's nice of you to release it for free because I know that it's an annoying thing to do.

Cheers,

Wesley, you have to ignore all these things.
There lot of of people where like your product because the emulator is very good.
Go start the project now and finish this.
Im really exciting about the new Features like jukebox, camera, group forum
etc.


so pls go on!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by steffchef

The source release probably comes as no real surprise to you.

Anyway, if people still trust you (and forget about the backdoor - that was certainly only meant to exist for plugin updates *cough*) they'll go with the original because of updates and shit.

Btw: Instead of telling everyone that the server code would be raped by forks if it was Open Source, couldn't you just admit that you want to remain in control (which is obviously the case - completely understand that)? Nevertheless it's nice of you to release it for free because I know that it's an annoying thing to do.

Cheers,

---

I don't want a butaflie 2.0 happen. Its why this development started in the first place.

That's why people stop releasing shit (also me). That ruins the community. Some of Jamals Haterboyz think they are cool because they release a closed source emulator as open source. Tell me, why?

Greetz,

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The General

Runtime updating of plugins. It does exactly what it says on the tin.

---

??

I didn't ask you to paraphrase what it does, I asked you to elaborate on it because I don't understand how adding your own IP to the rcon is useful to runtime plugin updating of other peoples servers.

Quote:

---

involving many carefully arranged parts or details; detailed and complicated in design and planning.

---

I knew this was going to happen. Anyways, I doubt that people would care about the source it's more like that they dislike you because of your own actions which caused it. They just love to see you in despair. Just getting the facts straight before you go telling everyone that they hate you and dislike you. I've warned you many times in the past. And the only one who is crying right now is you. Anyways thanks for putting a lot of time in your project but it seems that you failed for now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Luminia

That's why people stop releasing shit (also me). That ruins the community. Some of Jamals Haterboyz think they are cool because they release a closed source emulator as open source. Tell me, why?

Greetz,

---

Haters gonna hate.

look the developing thread there are so much hate from people like Dominicus and other random
Guys.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Quackster

??

I didn't ask you to paraphrase what it does, I asked you to elaborate on it because I don't understand how adding your own IP to the rcon is useful to runtime plugin updating of other peoples servers.

---

So I can connect back, directly to the emulator instead of launcher -> emulator. Because else a lot has to be done trough reflection.

And if people wouldn't want the updating there would've been an clear option to turn it off.

TheGeneral has the worst victimhood complex ever.
Inb4 his bumbuddy codemagic deletes this
What do I have to be jealous of @TheGeneral? My life's going great (thank God)

Restored the original post, please keep the fights down thanks.

See rules get bend by those who want to abuse them. No wonder.

And maybe burak has added backdoors to the source. I wouldn't trust that.

All I know is that I haven't.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Quackster

??

I didn't ask you to paraphrase what it does, I asked you to elaborate on it because I don't understand how adding your own IP to the rcon is useful to runtime plugin updating of other peoples servers.

---

It confuses me why you made it closed source when you stated on the very first page of this thread that you plan on releasing it open source after the initial testing, that makes no logical sense since people can tell you where the issues are and what to improve with your code rather than taking a "I know every inch of Java stfu" approach. And surely when releasing the launcher / jar file you expected it to get cracked (take a look at the sections history) rather than thinking "No one can crack this in the HH community stfu". As for the Emulator and situation currently, I should have bet money.

This isnt even a good emulator ? Why does anyone even care, when Sledmores Plus edit is out...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Danny

This isnt even a good emulator ? Why does anyone even care, when Sledmores Plus edit is out...

---

Don't write comments like this when you havent tested it lmao. Sledmores Emulator is awesome and very clean but how can you say that this one is bad?

#sledmorefanboooi

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Danny

This isnt even a good emulator ? Why does anyone even care, when Sledmores Plus edit is out...

---

Then how about you keep all those rude comments to yourself and just use something else. There are plenty of other open source emulators out there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Danny

This isnt even a good emulator ? Why does anyone even care, when Sledmores Plus edit is out...

---

Wow, really?. Sledmore is a known good developer in this community but as you can see his emulator is not <u>perfect</u> and sledmore himself has stated that on his topic. The General's emulator is from scratch and is written in JAVA while Sledmore's edit was touched by another Developer and is in C#. Sledmore's Emulator isn't the cleanest emulator like some things can be improved (code wise, *The approach*) like LTD and items and well the room cycle and football is not perfect I can latterly go through the source all day and point these things out. The General's has virtually no bugs and is comparable with Habbo itself. As @Luminia has said you need to test before commenting in the future.

Oi. Haven't seen a positive comment from you in a while on things I've been doing. @KyleeIsProzZ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KyleeIsProzZ

Wow, really?. Sledmore is a known good developer in this community but as you can see his emulator is not <u>perfect</u> and sledmore himself has stated that on his topic. The General's emulator is from scratch and is written in JAVA while Sledmore's edit was touched by another Developer and is in C#. Sledmore's Emulator isn't the cleanest emulator like some things can be improved (code wise, *The approach*) like LTD and items and well the room cycle and football is not perfect I can latterly go through the source all day and point these things out. The General's has virtually no bugs and is comparable with Habbo itself. As @Luminia has said you need to test before commenting in the future.

---

I really hate when someone is comparing a programming language because the performance / memory usage etc. are determined mostly by the developer.
And if the developer prefers C# then should he program a server in C#..
And if the developer prefers to program in Java then should he program a server in Java.

Btw Wesley good job by releasing the emulator and yeah it was already know that someone should decompile the source...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spot Ify

I really hate when someone is comparing a programming language because the performance / memory usage etc. are determined mostly by the developer.
And if the developer prefers C# then should he program a server in C#..
And if the developer prefers to program in Java then should he program a server in Java.

Btw Wesley good job by releasing the emulator and yeah it was already know that someone should decompile the source...

---

Someone with brain in this forum...

I guess this shows that the RZ Habbo community is still very much alive. ^^

With this release we are now able to choose from several good emulator sources what we want to use. Honestly @The General shouldn't even have tried to obfuscate it/make it closed source since it is only an invitation for somebody to crack it. It is a way for the cracker to earn some likes as well. I don't understand why people call this a bad emulator, as it is probably 10 times better than the emulators we used to use like Bcstorm and swift emulator and such.

Anyways, thanks for releasing the source.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gaby

I don't understand why people call this a bad emulator, as it is probably 10 times better than the emulators we used to use like Bcstorm and swift emulator and such.

---

I wouldn't compare this Emulator to trash edits like those.

AFAIK he didn't even try to obfuscate method, class names or strings. So idk why he could see it coming.

And for the RCON backdoor everybody is complaining about, it's not a big deal. Looks like a Hamachi IP aswell. And your firewall should not allow all connections to that port either.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ησвяαιη

I wouldn't compare this Emulator to trash edits like those.

---

That's exactly my point, those were trash. This is not a trash emulator, but apparantly the standards are so high nowadays that you have to release Habbos own server to just slightly compete with PlusEmu.

That sledmore decided to release is a fking mystery imo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by oleaa

AFAIK he didn't even try to obfuscate method, class names or strings. So idk why he could see it coming.

---

He didn't? o.o Well then he could even more see it coming, since getting the source should be a piece of cake then.

@KyleeIsProzZ @Luminia Who said I didn't test, I actually did, so keep your irrelevant comments to your self, thank you honey

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Danny

@KyleeIsProzZ @Luminia Who said I didn't test, I actually did, so keep your irrelevant comments to your self, thank you honey

---

Do you have some arguments to why it's not a good emulator? :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gaby

Do you have some arguments to why it's not a good emulator? :P

---

First of all its java, hardly no features and oh ya there a f***ing back door that was placed in the emulator himself. Oh and that :flushtoilet command also just to add to it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Danny

First of all its java, hardly no features and oh ya there a f***ing back door that was placed in the emulator himself. Oh and that :flushtoilet command also just to add to it.

---

What a stupid reason.

First of all this has more features, some of these features will be arriving in the next big update which he had stated before. Everything works, in fact more shit works on this emulator than boons emulator? O and theirs nothing wrong with Java, so giving this as one of the reasons why this is a bad emulator is a joke.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by oleaa

AFAIK he didn't even try to obfuscate method, class names or strings. So idk why he could see it coming.

And for the RCON backdoor everybody is complaining about, it's not a big deal. Looks like a Hamachi IP aswell. And your firewall should not allow all connections to that port either.

---

Actually, the IP (5.196.70.224) links to his website (************) :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Danny

First of all its java, hardly no features and oh ya there a f***ing back door that was placed in the emulator himself. Oh and that :flushtoilet command also just to add to it.

---

Oh honey, why are you lying? You didn't test it. The reasons you give are just comments from this thread.
You didnt do anything, you read the comments and then just post a comment with "This emu is shit because" and then you gave 'reasons' from other comments.

So stop lying. @The General didn't make any backdoors into it. It's even not a big deal babe, your firewall shouldn't even allow all connections trough that port. So Danny you girl, stop trying to be a cool bitch and get real.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by oleaa

AFAIK he didn't even try to obfuscate method, class names or strings. So idk why he could see it coming.

And for the RCON backdoor everybody is complaining about, it's not a big deal. Looks like a Hamachi IP aswell. And your firewall should not allow all connections to that port either.

---

Programming class 101 Lesson 3: Can't use reflection when using obfuscation eh. Smartass.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gaby

That's exactly my point, those were trash. This is not a trash emulator, but apparantly the standards are so high nowadays that you have to release Habbos own server to just slightly compete with PlusEmu.

---

Then why not have a little bit of respect towards the developer and wait till the full source code gets officially released in beta? Its not that hard.

Its funny, first giving me shit and then later saying; "This emulator is quite good."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheOleg

Lol, this is terrible.
https://pp.vk.me/c630016/v630016256/...r6YfYl7_KU.jpg

---

I though Wesley was using a Better Error System...
@The General why not code a Database Factory? Also including a better Error System with Specified Exception Types, that implements the Exception Interface..
Also i though Java has better error catching than the music (Try Catch Finally Try Catch (is a music))

Why not implement Exception Manager? with specified Exception Models?

Moderators, you just deleted information about possible vulnerabilities. I'm not saying they're intentional, and whether or not they are is irrelevant anyways. The users of this emu should know about them, and deleting posts which shows them is stupid.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AWA

Moderators, you just deleted information about possible vulnerabilities. I'm not saying they're intentional, and whether or not they are is irrelevant anyways. The users of this emu should know about them, and deleting posts which shows them is stupid.

---

If people stopped acting like little brats and posted relevant information only ( ie: without flame, spam or off-topic mixed into their posts ) then the "relevant" information would still be there.