I went though some pics and found that a 640mb 8800 gts had higher fps then a ATI HD 3750 XT.
I thought no way.
Are ATI loosing it?
But it reacon ATI are going wiv console grafix like the Nintendo wii tbh. Has any body else got anything about this?
Printable View
I went though some pics and found that a 640mb 8800 gts had higher fps then a ATI HD 3750 XT.
I thought no way.
Are ATI loosing it?
But it reacon ATI are going wiv console grafix like the Nintendo wii tbh. Has any body else got anything about this?
firstly you are a colossal moron,
secondly, you are comparing card performance from different performance brackets/tiers.
in so many ways everything you say here is wrong, i just dont know where to begin.
i want to see what pics give you fps ?Quote:
I went though some pics
unless you mean benchmarks..
are you an engineer for graphical processing ?Quote:
I thought no way.
do you know the difference between opengl and dx9 ? any idea what vertex shaders are ? pixel shaders ?
i mean do you know? not if you can use google and burp up some info you wont even understand.
you do fucking understand that HD3870 CF is the top bananas from ati.
mid range HD 3750xt is the descision that made you think an entire company is doomed?
Try comparing the 3870XT to the 8800GTS 640 and they will be much closer but still the 3870XT is much cheaper.
If you really want to see what ATI does good is the sub $150 cards and the $400-450 cards. At those price brackets they are the best single card solution.
Also next time think before you post.
NoPeace - out
Damn you are like so retarded that id like to slap you!!! What pics did you look? Someone playd train simulator and activated FPS meter is that it ..... dumbass.
And please go cut your f**king signature.
OK i only looked at it never sed it could be true am unsure that is why i posted. Now i no.
Unsure .... if you have used computer like a half year and know a bit then you should know that some screenies are bullshit and no proof.