-
[REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
5/10 good app but the language =/ Nice try though, try updateing the language, English would be the best imo.
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
Thank You. I'll translate as soon as possible.
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
use filefront.. lol
btw whats it coded in?
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
5/10
microsoft frontpage alot better.
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
Sorry but i don't understand what you say!
I know, microsoft frontpage is better but this software has been done with VB6 and by a guy.
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
release the source code please :)
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
This is the source code when it is italian: http://rapidshare.com/files/12098595...ource.zip.html
Plz, put the source when you use this code for your program.
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
Quote:
Originally Posted by
EliteGM
So u can leeech it? =p
nah i just wanted to see how he made it save the file
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
no rapidshare is being a bitch to me
lol
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
Wich file would you that i host?
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
Good Job, 6/10 - But can't you just use MS frontpage? =] That's what i use anyway.
But good programming!
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
Aptana is much much better. Seriously. A nice attempt but I can't really figure any use for that :( If you need an IDE, Aptana wins, if you want a lightweight editor, Notepad++ is excellent.
FrontPage, Dreamweaver etc etc are just bunch of crap for those who can't code their HTML correctly.
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vineyard
Aptana is much much better. Seriously. A nice attempt but I can't really figure any use for that :( If you need an IDE, Aptana wins, if you want a lightweight editor, Notepad++ is excellent.
FrontPage, Dreamweaver etc etc are just bunch of crap for those who can't code their HTML correctly.
Hard-coding HTML is for people with too much time on their hands.. I use Dreamweaver to do the HTML for me. I don't see any shame in that. As for Microsoft Frontpage.. Eww! lol.. I can't work with that to make professional websites. Mostly because I have no experience with it.
Now, you should know HTML before you attempt to learn and use Dreamweaver; But I picked up HTML by working with Dreamweaver, and other WYSIWYG editors. I'd love to see one of your websites you made with notepad. I bet it's complete crap. To me, there's no point in making a whole website with no good editor.
Dreamweaver is not for people short of HTML skill, but for people who've mastered the art of HTML, and whom are ready to skip through the simple parts of creating a website. All while moving on to more complicated things that absolutely must be hard-coded; Such as PHP, PERL, Python, etc.
Don't come at me with these ignorant posts..
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vineyard
FrontPage, Dreamweaver etc etc are just bunch of crap for those who can't code their HTML correctly.
Alright, you go take two minutes manually write up some HTML code to organize data and display it in a table. I'll just click a few buttons and get the same result in 5 seconds. Oh, the table's position is off a little. You go in and fine tune the position using numbers, I'll use a WYSIWYG interface and move it around until it's exactly like I want it.
I'm sure you see my point.
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
0/10
Bad language choice.
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
Quote:
Originally Posted by
s-p-n
Hard-coding HTML is for people with too much time on their hands.. I use Dreamweaver to do the HTML for me. I don't see any shame in that. As for Microsoft Frontpage.. Eww! lol.. I can't work with that to make professional websites. Mostly because I have no experience with it.
Now, you should know HTML before you attempt to learn and use Dreamweaver; But I picked up HTML by working with Dreamweaver, and other WYSIWYG editors. I'd love to see one of your websites you made with notepad. I bet it's complete crap. To me, there's no point in making a whole website with no good editor.
Dreamweaver is not for people short of HTML skill, but for people who've mastered the art of HTML, and whom are ready to skip through the simple parts of creating a website. All while moving on to more complicated things that absolutely must be hard-coded; Such as PHP, PERL, Python, etc.
Don't come at me with these ignorant posts..
If what you are implying is that you should not use Dreamweaver if you don't know anything about HTML you're wayyy wrong.
Dreamweaver is for the people willing to learn how to edit and "create" HTML, PHP, PERL, ect...
It is also for people who know everything about HTML, PHP, and others.
When I first started web designing I used Dreamweaver and Frontpage. That same day I did realize that Dreamweaver is a bit better (my opinion). Anyways my point is, I started with downloading pre-made web layouts and editing them using Dreamweaver. I had no idea what to do, but with dreamweaver you can edit the design itself instead of messing with the codes. When I highlighted stuff I would look at the codes section and see what part i was editing. Soon after I learned how to edit the codes and it was "quicker" in a sense. When you learn to edit layouts then it becomes a lot easier to make a web layout.
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
I use DW because of it's syntax highlighting and high user friendlyness, I always code everything myself, never use the inbuilt function for it.
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
Quote:
Originally Posted by
s-p-n
. I'd love to see one of your websites you made with notepad. I bet it's complete crap.
http://foxx.fsdesign.cz/fms/
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
lmao.
Are you really saying that your website is 100% coded with notepad?
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
It's possible ofcourse.
You just have a little less overview imo.
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
I use notepad ++ also. It's freaking awesome.
This program is okay, but its pretty useless, considering theres things like Notepad++ and MS FrontPage.
But good job on it!
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
Overview? That's what the browser is for ;)
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
Where'd you rip source from, eh?
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
Lol
Well nice job then.
I don't use Notepad++
I'll download it and see if it is any good..
Edit: LMFAO! Notepad++ is like a mini version of Frontpage.
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Monsta.
Where'd you rip source from, eh?
..what?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Carter
Lol
Edit: LMFAO! Notepad++ is like a mini version of Frontpage.
Senseless.
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Foxx123
Senseless.
Bite Me >.<
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
notepad++ is a light code editor with highlighting of several programming languages
frontpage is a stupid microsoft's wysiwyg editor which makes crappy code and has no highlighting at all
these two are COMPLETELY different applications.
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
you obviously didn't get what I was saying..whatever it doesn't matter...it would be a stupid argument.
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
i would never use any html editor wether it be notepad++, frontpage, dreamweaver or anything, i use notepad and thats it. and i can still make some good lookign websites.
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
Saving the html file is the easy part. now opening one to edit is a whole different story.
-
Re: [REL]HTML Editor V2.0.3 by Ketto93
5/10
Bad design and maybe multi-language support ?