Printable View
I'm starting the nominations for worst games of 2004.
I nominate Halo 2.
My reasoning is, they sold a half finished product, their multiplayer servers are bogged down 24/7, the updates will never come, people CHEAT way to much (scripts and such), and kids/adults with no balls. OH, did I mention cheating?
Let the flaming begin.Quote:
Originally Posted by youth
ROFL that really does sound shit :/ but the worst game ever of all time in the world in the history of games in the whole entire time the earth has been around EVER has gotta be "ephemeral phantasia" it's so damn boring it should come with a warning telling you the chance's of slipping into a coma through sheer boredom is highly likely. But that wasnt released in 2004, does that matter?
I think halo 2 is very good, but it should be called Halo: Multiplayer. As there is bugger all change. Worst game?...hmm, cant really think of one lol, I onlt buy good games really.
Bubsy 3D for PS1 was utter wank, maybe that
i nominate..... hmm FFX-2 :)!!!
Backyard Wrestling.. something like that, I have it and I played for 7 min.. and now it's catching dust somewhere in the house.
pos.
I nominate GTA:SA due to the fact that its not out for pc yet
http://www.gamefaqs.com/computer/dos...ew/919220.htmlQuote:
Originally Posted by Whong
Omfg... As you can see, this game is so crappy that im pretty sure a 13 year old can do better by somehow putting together a game with java or flash. Personally, if it somehow ever went into hell, satan would probably have to find a new vacant lot, or forever be haunted by the ending screen of... "You're Winner!"
The getaway and drvier 3, true crime
GTA wannabes and they all shite imo
Halo 2 is nomited, my continuation, for a bullshit campaign, horrid graphics, storyline that is not so apparent, and MAJOR glitches. The multiplayer has been invaded by kids, CHEATERS (I can't join a game without atleast one), assholes, whiners, and griefers. I don't know why, or how, anyone could think this game is worth more than a penny, and not a shiny one!
Syndicate.. shut up. There, I "flamed" you. Review; asshole. I call your little bit spam, and attention whoring, a BIG pet peeve of mine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Narusegw
I agree...I was so let down when it came out. Even though I am a girl, this game was way to girly!!! They changed during battles!! Not one of Square's finest that's for sure, it's all Enix's fault
Enix---> :chair: <----Squaresoft
Did you all forget that this thread said 2004 crappy awards.. Its not all about halo 2 you know, Lol for the 2004 crappiest game I nominate!!!...
- Medal of honor :) *CoD would own it... hands down
Medal of Honor is pretty bad, but I fall back on the RPGs of this year, I think they own the FPS genre in worst. For the time being atleast.
FInal Fantasy makes a good nomination for crappy ingame graphics, bad elements, terrible plot and storyline, bad immersion, and "random battles".
Youth you're here just to spam this thread with shite and no research.... so please just get lost :thumbup:
The worst game would have to be Ultimate Demolition Derby for PC...... man that SUCKED
That is an old game, this is 2004.. do some research. Just because the review is post on January 1st, does not mean the game was released this year.
Have to agree with youth.. Halo 2 is the worst games of 2004.
Thanks for being the perfect example of a person with no research or knowledge that flames a game/series.Quote:
Originally Posted by youth
I will start this off with, "flames"?! The correct term is grief.Quote:
Originally Posted by Xzaro
A perfect example of not doing product research you say? Prove me wrong, how are the in game graphics compared to that of a playstation one game? The same I would say, which is not arguable, sinced that is what they are. Storyline is short of pathetic, always some girl in trouble, and quite overdone. The script is written at a grade school writing and comprehension level.
Quote:
Originally Posted by youth
Horrid Graphics?? I would love to see you do better
I can, and I have called out their graphic designers, but I havn't received any reply from their team.. accept for a coder, and hes a prick.
[EDIT]
It easily done, they make the models lower quality for the sake of frames.
u didn't say that the game had to be released this year... you just said that this is the 2004 worst game awards......suggesting that it could be any game.Quote:
Originally Posted by youth
No, that suggests worst games of 2004.
sorry FFX-2 was way worse than halo2, halo2 does infact suck but ffx-2 takes the bag.
Quote:
Originally Posted by youth
I beg to differ. In ffx, the main character may be Yuna, and she's on her journey to death. The whole game revolves around that journey. Everyone has to die, but Yuna is going to die earlier than most of the people her age, that's where ffx scored; to let people understand that LIFE is a journey that eventually leads to death, so whether you want life to be full of joy or sorrow, the choice is yours. Just because Yuna is going to die soon, which will happen eventually, that does not mean she's in trouble. If you still insist that she's in some sort of trouble, then let me tell you that YOUR LIFE is in trouble.Quote:
Originally Posted by youth
In ffviii, the story revolves about squall running around to save the gardens, riona is only a sidekick, she does get in trouble, but that is so that squall can play hero and save her. I don't see how the game revolves around 'some girl in trouble'. I can list other ff that does not involves around 'some girl in trouble' if u want.
If you are so concerned about the graphics, why don't you spend your money on matrix eh? full of breathtaking graphic but with a plot as plain as mineral water. Just because it has random battles, that does not make it a lousy game, if that's the case why don't you go play some diablo or mu-like games. I belive that many rpg created for television console games have random battles, if you don't like it go play some mmorpgs.
I made my point and i rest my case.
sky