Printable View
I come form thailand.I'm interested in this game.
I've edited font form size from 10 to 15,but be straight Npro detect.(I use OLLYDBG)
Error:
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/2199/27361559.jpg
I want to main.exe(No Npro). I resolve to use Thai Language.(Ex. สู้ )
If you have suggestions please tell me.
Hmm,
I think there's no Main.exe w/o GG.
I suggest using this GG files here.
use the hexed main.exe
It don't work,but thanks.
How is it across?
huh?
wth you're saying?
hmmm base on my observation PS of ragnarok is using a main.exe without a GG.... i know that cause in the past years i also create a PS of ragnarok. eventually all ragnarok online not ps is using GG for the client. (sorry for the out of thread....)
Dang~.
Grand Chase isn't Ragnarok, and is on development and not fully stable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by anginafectoris
First of all, comparing GC with Ragnarok is pointless... the two games are completely different in so many things (implementation, program design, algorithm development, process controls, etc.). Second, Ragnarok came way before GC, therefore there's a lot of time to reverse-engineer it (or it was already messed-up back then... having a call function).
My theory is that Ragnarok uses an external call function (meaning the main.exe calls processes on a different file, and in that file contains the list of things needed to do), since I could barely recall that it does have a list of things to call. Unlike GC that calls the GG right away.
In short, you are bound to suffer unless there's a good person out there who would do reverse engineering.
Can you explain me reverse engineering?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/reverse_engineering
Simply put, you create the algorithm & the codes based from the made program.
i thought it is to decompile a program and find out what codes made the program?
^ Not really.
Although decompiling it and out the code goes is one way of doing it, it commonly ends up with a messed-up coding (since it's most likely program-generated codes, it's more unstable when recompiled)
The one I posted is more accurate than doing that... though it's random and very tedious.
yea k then i shall go learn Reverse engineering for my career JK
If you probably learn.Quote:
Originally Posted by tanhc99
Please do help ^^.
^ Good luck with that. It's not an easy thing.
I wonder if you can decompile GC.
Sorry if this is considered spam.