Hey, can I get an AntiCheat / AntiHack program for my server?
If you can get me it, Thx :)
But if not.. Then its ok.. Thx for trying :).
Printable View
Hey, can I get an AntiCheat / AntiHack program for my server?
If you can get me it, Thx :)
But if not.. Then its ok.. Thx for trying :).
http://cplusplus.com/
:P Even a simple blacklist is better than nothing.
O.o D: I can't do C++ XD :[Quote:
Originally Posted by Tman151
If you want a full blown anti-hack, either make one yourself (C++) or buy one.
If you want to make a simple blacklist, or process checker, VB, C#, C, Delphi, the list can go on.
Why would a "full blown" anti-cheat require C++?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tman151
Why not? Making a real good anti-cheat in VB is futile.Quote:
Originally Posted by gWX0
C# and/or Delphi could do a good job, but not as well as C++ could.
It all comes out on the same dll or application. Just the language isn't that "perfect" to use for an antihack/cheatQuote:
Originally Posted by Tman151
C and MASM/NASM-style ASM can produce identical code to C++.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tman151
D is also a valid choice.
Delphi is pro for this too. You can use C++ code ASM Code and other languages too. And it's pretty easy to learn compared to c++.
Delphi is incredibly bloated, hence C(++) or ASM being the preferred solution.Quote:
Originally Posted by XZeenon
I was 1/2 right! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by gWX0
Not many people would write an anti-cheat in ASM though.
In the case of Gunz, ASM would be a preferred solution - you could write the cheat to be embedded into the main Gunz client, not being executed without Gunz being executed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tman151
Many devs have been doing this for ages..
That actually made sense. O.OQuote:
Originally Posted by gWX0
Since alot of people don't know what MDAEMON (neither do i), ASM would be a good choice in GunZ.
O.O Whats a ASM?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tman151
Assembly; the most popular flavor for Windows being Microsoft Assembly.Quote:
Originally Posted by killerzx
The conclusion:
*No will give you an anti hack. You need to make it you self.
I prefer starting c# and use kill process.
That's an nice way to start.
Ok, I'll try that but idk the code for it the antihack D:Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroCold
User-mode blacklist with no obfuscation, code virtualization, or similar protection schemas is a terrible way to start.Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroCold
Here's a little kick start, look through the whole thread.
http://forum.ragezone.com/f144/resol...or-exe-579575/
Now you're just expanding on the poor idea of a user-mode blacklist.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tman151
Atleast its something for the noobs in c++, Not everyone got the skills to make a pro antihack..Quote:
Originally Posted by gWX0
A blacklist can usually end up causing more problems than solving, especially if the blacklist finds a false-positive.Quote:
Originally Posted by Trilest
I would say otherwise.
So your saying I shouldn't use this? "http://forum.ragezone.com/f144/resolved-c-how-to-kill-processes-containing-word-like-injector-exe-579575/" ?O.OQuote:
Originally Posted by gWX0
Yes, that's what I'm saying.Quote:
Originally Posted by killerzx
oh ok... Then what else should I do? Since idk the codes or anything about making an AntiHack I guess I don't get one then :(.Quote:
Originally Posted by gWX0
lol my post :PQuote:
Originally Posted by Tman151
xD Blacklist is usefull in some cases.
Edit :-
just as an addon to ur anticheat is some wat better
Ofc its easy to bypass and it doesnt bring any harm in adding it
oh ok.. I'll be trying that out :D.Quote:
Originally Posted by katsumi
Unless the blacklist accidentally closes the wrong application, in which it does do harm in being there.Quote:
Originally Posted by katsumi