Printable View
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmIaAi4ioWQ"]YouTube - Miley Cyrus Stalker Mark McLeod Released From Jail![/ame]
Comeplete utter bs...
Since when was the act of 'admiration' considered as a conduct disorder?Quote:
"He was going to marry her."
"I will fucking be with miley."
I;d love to fuck this shit outta miley, but beat some sense into her at the same time ^^
I dont know about that same time thing. But how about fuck the shit out of her then beat some sense into her after it with a crowbar?
To put her into shape for round 2?Quote:
Originally Posted by WingedCow
Who is Miley?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rishwin
Or for not being in the kitchen?
i don't know, but that man is mark. and he was jailed for being so obssesed of a thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron
So.... the beginning stages of obsession/stalking is not disorderly? Regardless of how idiotic a star may be, no one deserves to be in that position. The dude clearly has psychological issues that need to be resolved.Quote:
Originally Posted by IQstim
Why not? Maybe the obsession/stalking was there for a good cause, maybe not - who knows. stop being irrational.Quote:
Originally Posted by bboy242
How is it irrational to say that someone doesn't deserve to be stalked? If anything, you people that think this is ok are being irrational. Listen to his statement when he got arrested. "I will fucking be with Miley!". Are you kidding me? How is that not the least bit psychotic? Obviously if he got arrested, it means she (or her dad) filed a report about it, making the attention from him unwanted. Then to make a statement like that WHILE being arrested further proves he intends to be with her, be it consentual or not. If you can't tell that this would only escalate to great extents, then you need to reevaluate your perspective on sanity.Quote:
Originally Posted by IQstim
"I will fucking be with Miley!" does not sound a threat to me. and convicting an individual for acting admiration towards a person is rather insane.
i must say, i agree with your point that a 50 year-old man who intends to be partnered with a younger person seems pedophilic. but that isn't the point i am trying to involve in this discussion, the main actual point i was to involve is myopic in your perspective - let me explain - having him convicted and jailed without a proper evidence (because "I will fucking be with miley" isn't an evidence of an actual act of crime) for admiring an individual seems insane to me. they could have at least gave the woman a protection rather than arresting the 'innocent man'.
to prove your irrationality - how certain are you to presume that this man is a pedophile? a man with a 12 year-old brain, he could be. gay, he could be.
He thought she was sending him messages through her performances. How is that not obsessive?
This man is clearly obsessed, I know someone who is completely obsessed with her and this guy puts my friend to shame when it comes to obsessive behavior. If you were being constantly stalked by someone, you would want the police to do something about itQuote:
Originally Posted by IQstim
Quote:
Originally Posted by IQstim
Please point out where I mentioned anything related to being a pedophile. :blink: In that aspect though, it's almost similar to if I were to state I am going to bomb a building. Of course there is no proof of an actual crime but it is still a threat. The attention he was giving was clearly unwanted if they (Miley and/or Billy Ray) contacted the police about it. There is a difference between admiration and obsession. Admiring is "Wow, she is beautiful. I wish she was my girlfriend!". Obsession is "I will be with her, and there is nothing the police can do about it.". How do you not see a difference between the two? Basically, what you are saying is, they should allow him to do whatever he wants because he hasn't harmed her. So in other words, don't do anything to him until he does something. Ok, I can somewhat agree on that... but why allow the chance for him to do anything?
With the way he acts/talks, he is clearly dillusional, and shows signs of hostility. Hostility leads to violence and/or death 9 outta 10 times. So we should give him the opportunity to do such things? Tell me.... if you have a child, and a man takes a liking to your child.... are you going to allow your child to be stalked by a man who blatantly states he will be with your child no matter what happens? Especially considering your child is a minor and he is in his 50s? If you said no, then you are a hypocrite.
So yet again I state, you are the one being irrational. Your basing your entire arguement on a point that was never brought up.... him being a "pedophile". I'm basing mine on statistics and facts.
that seems rhetorical, ask yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by bboy242
Then Billy-ray cyrus should have had security for her protection rather than convicting the one who hasn't done anything. How's that for a start?Quote:
Originally Posted by bboy242
And as for the topic about pedophilia, as you've mentioned that the man is physcotic, what difference does it make if you've said he;s a pedophile?
Should that suggest that the authority are delusional and are abusive with their power?Quote:
by someone, you would want the police to do something about it
How so? Obviously any rational and sane person would say NO... you do NOT allow someone the opportunity to do harm to another person.Quote:
Originally Posted by IQstim
By security, how are police not security? If anything, they are a much higher qualified security than a bodyguard.Quote:
Originally Posted by IQstim
There is a HUGE difference between being psycotic and being a pedophile. Do some research on it. Maybe you'll learn a thing or two, although that seems doubtful.Quote:
Originally Posted by IQstim
No, that suggests they would take the most reasonable action possible. Police don't just arrest people for shits and giggles. If they arrested him, they must have felt he crossed some borders. Honestly, I feel like this is a troll thread because I fail to see how anyone could possibly find the man to be the victim. To say that obsession/stalking is ok is one of the most radically insane statements I've ever heard/read.Quote:
Originally Posted by IQstim
Flame wars anybody?
Please, the guy is a stalker and US law hasn't caught up with it. Who knows, IQStim might be the stalker, even though he "says" he is from London :P
arrested and released the next day because of overcrowding..
i guess its just some shitty made up gossip story to get more money and attention from the media
and how does he get access so easily to miley..
I bet if you wanted to contact Hugh Laurie or anyone famous it would take you a lifetime (unless its a musician and you are lucky and get to go to the meet and greet/or they are not so famous and they're not so stuck-up)
Of course you would. DO IT FAGGOTQuote:
Originally Posted by Stup
wow, who the fuck would be obsessed with miley cyrus...oh wait....
Pedo Bear, 17 year old virgins, me, you, etcQuote:
Originally Posted by LightWarrior
The United States has a law against stalking. The man was arrested for breaking said law.
Your 'admiration' opinion is irrelevent.
I lol'd.
Miley is a pop star so shes gonna have fans.
But not to the point of that =O
Miley is a pop star and already got butthurt.
ehhh no......I have taste for REAL woman, I swear on my ballz, that I only like 21 and up for women, why? They're more mature, and especially more experienced.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny.
Miley Cyrus is some damn 15 year old brat who got famous by accident. I dont fantasy about little girls, I aint no pedo.
I would jail that psycho as well. That dude is probably going to rape Hannah Montana. This cannot be tolerated.