YouTube - Young Boy Strip Searched By TSA
Printable View
YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH fff
Must be nice touching up little boys.
Any TSA agent that doesn't quit on the spot when faced with being required to nude-scan a child or feel them up should be put in jail where they can proceed to be anally violated every day and possibly killed. You're not forced to do that shit, and the TSA can't operate without any employees.
These Americants need to grow a backbone.
Yes, an 8 year old boy is planning to smuggle explosives and/or guns onto the plane to kill hundreds of people, and hijack it to fly into the pentagon.
exactly wat i was thinking.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackbox
That's just absurd. How can they even imagine that a young boy would have a gun/knife/explosive with it?
statistics state that a child is more likely to be a terrorist than a full grown man or woman.
FUCK yeah we are americunts...
Hhuummm Little boys....
Yeah, if he's walking along the side of a road in Iraq holding a fucking AK-47. I highly doubt some suburban kid with his white as can be parents going to his grandparent's house for thanksgiving is even a remote threat to anyone on this planet.Quote:
Originally Posted by MentaL
Welcome to America. The land of the "I don't fucking care, you might have a bomb!" and "You don't have to worry if you don't have anything to hide." With the average intelligence level falling at an exponential rate now, it makes sense that we're incapable of critical thought.
this is true, is easyer to control the mind of a child cause their sense of good and wrong is totally affected by their enviorment and how it affects em, imagine a 8 yr old that lives in a contry club where all is safe and there isnt any danger and a kid that lives in the middle of a guerrila zone, some of the second case would even be trained to kill or become dangerous, hitler once tryed something like this in the schools during his time.Quote:
Originally Posted by MentaL
of course parents inflect but terrorist childs or kid like soldiers are a total posibility
I'm sure you've forgotten about Columbine? Granted they were older, they were still "minors".Quote:
Originally Posted by jMerliN
What strikes me as amazing is the fact that everyones now making a big deal now that it's a kid, but oh god if an adult doesn't want themselves searched. Wasn't it just the other thread, where the majority of people were saying "Oh fucking Americunts always crying about their "rights""? Yes, it sucks, but the "possibility" is still there right? Why are you guys so adamant against kids being searched, but not adults? Choose a side...
Kinky.
7 year old kid. 2 17 year old manic depressive socially awkward fuckwits with parents that didn't care enough to notice something as obvious as planning a school shooting. Big, big difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawn
I'm adamant about intelligence being applied, not "everyone is guilty until proven innocent." The country wasn't founded on fascism.
I get that. It just confuses me how people brush it off when it's an adult, but start a riot when it's a minor. Minors are easily influenced, and chances are the kid had a pocket watch or some crap that raised suspicion. I'm sure the TSA isn't going to be like "Oh lawdy, dems some kids we'sa can touch up". If that were the case, there would have been a hell of a lot more reports of this sort of thing than just this video. All I'm saying is, people shouldn't talk shit about adults "bitching about their free rights", and then show sympathy toward a minor having to endure the same situation that an adult has to face, more so than minors.Quote:
Originally Posted by jMerliN
Child molester's new defense now - "I was checking if he had a bomb / gun"...
:|
I don't see the big deal, they searched a kid, so what. Anyone can have a bomb on them, doesn't matter that his parents are white.(I hope you know your comment on that sounded a bit racist) I've seen kids who grow up in the suburbs lash out during school and beat a kid with a chair. He lived with both his parents who were what you'd call "white as can be" and also pretty wealthy. Just because the kid's parents are white doesn't mean it's impossible for him to be a terrorist or something. 8 is young, but they're not dumb, they understand enough to be influenced by anyone. Doesn't mean their parents would know about it either. Look at how many kids are abused and parents don't find out till years later.Quote:
Originally Posted by jMerliN
Merlin, do us all a favor and stop posting.
Oh fucking Americunts always crying about their "rights".
You sound like a complete fucking idiot. Looks like we found someone even less capable of logical thought than troublemaker. I was pretty certain that was impossible, but congrats.Quote:
Originally Posted by [Jared]
What did the Americunt say to the Rishwin?Quote:
Originally Posted by Rishwin
Eat me.
:o
I doubt anyone thought the kid himself was a terrorist. It's more likely they dreamt up a scenario where he was being exploited by his parents and being used to carry the bomb on their behalf. It's stupid to argue that this kid could have been a terrorist and it's stupid to argue that the TSA thought the kid was a terrorist. The TSA aren't that stupid, and they're not a front for a clandestine paedophile ring, either. They're just paranoid, authoritarian and institutionally incapable of recognising what it means to go too far in the name of national security.
Orrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr...Quote:
Originally Posted by troublemaker1111
He had something metal on him which was triggering the metal detector so they had to find out what it was? Happened to me when i was maybe 8 or 9; I had a nail file in my jacket somewhere and they spent 10 minutes looking for it before they just took it off and scanned it separately. This was at least 12 years ago too, so the terrorist paranoid can't be an excuse, it's just legitimately part of their job.
Did they strip search you? No? Not really the same thing then.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rishwin
That said, I can't actually watch the video right now so I can only assume that the title is accurate and that they actually did strip search the kid. Truth be told, I'm doubtful.
Taking off his top =/= a strip search.Quote:
Originally Posted by troublemaker1111
As the video clearly shows, he only had 1 piece of clothing on his chest, and if it was really setting off the detector, they would have no choice but to take it off and scan it separately. Also, there's a good chance they gave the option to the parent, if he wanted this to be done in a private room instead. As we can see from his reactions, he really isn't too bothered about it either. So no, the title really isn't an accurate representation of the entire video.
He's male, and i don't see a problem with being topless. Guys walk into shopping centers around here without tops on, i really don't see how this is different.
Actually when I saw the video that is pretty much what I was thinking. That jacket or sweatshirt thing he had on probably had some metal in it. So when he went through the thing it beeped, then when they waved the wand over him it beeped, and so they took it off.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rishwin
I think people are just really sensitive right now because of the hype about the body scanners. I am kind of on the fence about the whole thing to be honest. I mean, some idiot put a bomb in his fking shoe so now I gotta have my shoes scanned separately every time I fly. That annoys me, but I know why I have to do it.
I think people don't have a similar connection with the body scanners. Honestly I think that the whole idea was just to speed up the process of getting people through security. It sounds like it may have been abused by a couple of employees which caused all the privacy issue. I think employee abuse is always some concern, because don't have any more control over the kid at the fast food restaurant spitting in your burger.
The points on intelligence are valid. People in general are stupid. So with the rampant stupidity you can expect them to try stupid things, like putting bombs in their shoes, or on their kids and any other wildly stupid thing you can think of.
As I recall, most of the attempts have been unnoticed by metal detectors. So to push a super-insanely invasive search (yes, go ahead, feel my crotch pls.. thx!, naked scanner, strip search, cavity search, etc) as a result of a metal detector going off doesn't seem logical. Run a wand over them, if it goes off and there's not an obvious gun/knife there, they should be good. When was the last time you saw something small enough to be undetectable outside of intense scrutiny in a child's shirt that could bring down a plane .. or even do more than scratch a person? Nope, me neither. When people don't think, fascism happens.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rishwin
Besides, we all know that ceramic blades are better than metal blades.
Dude, I literally just told you I can't watch the video right now, so please don't talk like it's obvious or 'clear' what was going on. A brief description would have sufficed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rishwin
Anyway, I googled the story, and from what I read it seems it was actually the father who removed the kid's top on his own accord hoping to speed up the process. This story may have been exaggerated for publicity or whatever, but this by no means invalidates my overall point. The powers of the TSA are excessive, intrusive and almost asking to be abused by their under-trained, often power-mad staff. I could pick from any number of recent stories to illustrate my point, but I can't be bothered.
Actually, small bombs aren't impossible, a bomb the size of a baseball is large enough to take out enough to make a plane go down.Quote:
Originally Posted by jMerliN
Yeh, i read that part. Hence why i was explaining what the video was showing. "As the video clearly shows" and "as we can see from his reactions" is me explaining the video to you, and the reasoning behind why i am saying these things. People have to be specific around you else you start nit-picking at every small detail.Quote:
Originally Posted by troublemaker1111
I tried to told em Rishie
A baseball on a kid that's 3 ft tall will be incredibly obvious.Quote:
Originally Posted by [Jared]
Like I've said before, terrorists aren't going to try to bring a plane down. I'm quite sure anything in regards to a bomb or hijacking etc on a plane is almost certainly a conspiracy to extend the power of the TSA and various other agencies in direct opposition to the constitution.
Seriously, I know the people we are told are "terrorists" aren't stupid enough to think that it's effective in any measure to bring down a plane. Bring a shopping bag into an airport and blow the damn thing up. Kill tens of thousands of people, not a few hundred. And it's a LOT easier than sneaking a bomb on a plane. Logically it makes no sense, if terror is what they want to instill and the american way of life is what they want to attack, we have 100+ places that are far more effective as a target and more easily exploited than an airplane in flight. Faced with that, why is it the TSA keeps getting more and more power with more capability to intrude and invade privacy, even completely ignore many laws that exist just for the sake of "security" ? Unless the terrorists own the TSA, I highly doubt this is a motivation.
Cogitamus: More TSA Abuses: Woman Beaten; 71-year-old man & 16-year-old girl groped, stripped
YouTube - TSA pulls pants off 71 y/o man with knee implant
In the name of safety, or just completely going overboard?
Well the guy has a knee implant, which could mean metal is in his leg. There are breast implant bombs, wouldn't be hard to make a knee implant bomb. They're there to make sure bombs don't get on the planes, just sayin'.
Just gives me another reason to never fly anywhere.
I have a short fuse when it comes to my temper. If they ever throw me to the ground like that I'm going to do something I'll regret.