Don't say pwadmin tired of it players got smarter and keep messing around it so no...
I am wondering if there is something similar to it and up to date ... 1 more tool besides sEL that keeps failing me >.>
Printable View
Don't say pwadmin tired of it players got smarter and keep messing around it so no...
I am wondering if there is something similar to it and up to date ... 1 more tool besides sEL that keeps failing me >.>
whats wrong with pwadmin?
whats wrong with sELedit ? :blink:
+ There is nothing more updated than pwAdmin atm. Unless you do your own customized server management tools.
i pointed what's wrong with it in my first post
the and with sEL is the convert scripts are messed up can't do my own cus i don't really wanna know how and what's the point while i can use some other tools at the same time it seems i have to had open 2 sEL (1sever 1 client) to actually make it work and alot of time needed to actually make it wich i don't have
(overall the convert script messes up my server sided elements...
works fine when adding it manually )
well thanks for the answer Rom ...
why not run pwAdmin CLOSED to the WAN like I do (port 8443 er sumthin)... you can even keep a separate JSP container on 8080 so players can still have/use things like GetItem GetGold and GuildIcon. If you run pwAdmin so it's only local to LAN -- players can't even get near it let alone touch it...
I'm guessing you would know how to do this, should you not -- check out my release ;)
Never had any issue with sELedit when converting client side to server side :mellow:
nevermind that :D i'm using kuqois now
still stuck with pwadmin well i kinda settled it but didn't wanted to ip banning every1 besideds few ip's
Why don't you use iptables?
or even better, http tunnels.
then you can bind it to localhost.
anyways i was trying to change the pwadmin i was asking for iweb(really like oldschool) or similar
but i sort of solved it with a chinesse iweb(wich it seems is up to date) so thanks anyways
and around the server administration i can manage that i did my own way with only allowing few ip's anyway i wasn't asking for measures of protection...