Simple (first) web template

~Removed~

hey how about the security for that template?

did u learn on how to make script for anti-flood/ddos

its just like tricks...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fadfunky

hey how about the security for that template?

did u learn on how to make script for anti-flood/ddos

its just like tricks...

---

What? Anti DDOS in a web template. You are a genius sir.

Nice template

Simple, clean, not bad!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fadfunky

hey how about the security for that template?

did u learn on how to make script for anti-flood/ddos

its just like tricks...

---

What the fu..?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kore

What? Anti DDOS in a web template. You are a genius sir.

---

How a 'denial of service' attack works - CNET News

facepalm.jpg

Code:

---

@font-face {
        font-family:'delicious';
        src:url(fonts/delicious.otf);
}

---

useless

Code:

---

        margin:0 auto 0 auto;

---

instead code it as

Code:

---

margin: 0 auto;

---

Code:

---

        background-attachment:scroll;
        background-image:url(images/bckground.gif);
        background-repeat:repeat-x;

---

Do it like this, it can save up for your time and the loading speed.

Code:

---

background:url(images/bckground.gif) scroll repeat-x;

---

Code:

---

<script type="text/javascript" src="js/jquery.js"></script>
        <script type="text/javascript" src="js/general.js"></script>

---

Place it before </head> instead at the bottom of the page.

I ran a checkup on The W3C Markup Validation Service ,no errors found.

Well, you have to keep it up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NubPro

Code:

---

@font-face {
    font-family:'delicious';
    src:url(fonts/delicious.otf);
}

---

useless

---

say what?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NubPro

Code:

---

        background-attachment:scroll;
        background-image:url(images/bckground.gif);
        background-repeat:repeat-x;

---

Do it like this, it can save up for your time and the loading speed.

Code:

---

background:url(images/bckground.gif) scroll repeat-x;

---

---

u talk about nano seconds. would u even prefer not to use any comments just the file isnt that large to download then? pff

although, his method is easier to read and understand, specially for newbies.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NubPro

Code:

---

<script type="text/javascript" src="js/jquery.js"></script>
        <script type="text/javascript" src="js/general.js"></script>

---

Place it before </head> instead at the bottom of the page.

---

Actually, it is quite common practice to put javascript at the bottom of the page (despite it being against standards). Because if you put it in the header, it all needs to load before the page can actually display. Putting javascript at the bottom of the page allows the actual page to display while the javascript is still being loaded.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Smitty

Actually, it is quite common practice to put javascript at the bottom of the page (despite it being against standards). Because if you put it in the header, it all needs to load before the page can actually display. Putting javascript at the bottom of the page allows the actual page to display while the javascript is still being loaded.

---

i would prefer to do it before the </head> and simply put it in a function that i call via onload. thats the most valid.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VibeTribe

i would prefer to do it before the </head> and simply put it in a function that i call via onload. thats the most valid.

---

Yes, but if you're loading several other functions, that may be timely to load, it will slow down the load-time of your page. So instead of loading the page, and letting the user do what they want while the 'extras' are loading, you're stopping them from accessing the page until everything (even stuff they wont necessarily use) is being loaded.

Here is a small writeup about why you should put scripts below your page:

Best Practices for Speeding Up Your Web Site

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by foxx

say what?

---

What talking you!?

Anyway, why the hell you need that script when its completely pointless

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VibeTribe

u talk about nano seconds. would u even prefer not to use any comments just the file isnt that large to download then? pff

although, his method is easier to read and understand, specially for newbies.

---

Hey you should improve a lot more before posting this

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NubPro

What talking you!?

Anyway, why the hell you need that script when its completely pointless


Hey you should improve a lot more before posting this

---

Delicious is a font that needs to be imported...

Looks pretty good thanks im going to use this :thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NubPro

What talking you!?

Anyway, why the hell you need that script when its completely pointless


Hey you should improve a lot more before posting this

---

PLEASE explain to me how it is pointless.

Oh my god. I don't give a shit about files or how they're scripted/wrote if that works fine without bugs that can be exploited or brick. Get the servers that is able to handle the website. That's it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NubPro

What talking you!?

Anyway, why the hell you need that script when its completely pointless

---

lol you are stupid

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NubPro

Hey you should improve a lot more before posting this

---

problems with my articulation? Go and cry at your mum.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Smitty

Yes, but if you're loading several other functions, that may be timely to load, it will slow down the load-time of your page. So instead of loading the page, and letting the user do what they want while the 'extras' are loading, you're stopping them from accessing the page until everything (even stuff they wont necessarily use) is being loaded.

Here is a small writeup about why you should put scripts below your page:

Best Practices for Speeding Up Your Web Site

---

so, i would let php manage what will be load and what not just by using more than one js file. (to prevent loading useless stuff)
but at the end, you are right, even if im not a fan of that. your method is just not recommend on stuff that rly must be load before but i think your method is recommend if we got plenty java script to load.
btw, thx for the link =)

im just not sure, its w3c conform to put style tags below the </html> lol.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VibeTribe

problems with my articulation? Go and cry at your mum.


so, i would let php manage what will be load and what not just by using more than one js file. (to prevent loading useless stuff)
but at the end, you are right, even if im not a fan of that. your method is just not recommend on stuff that rly must be load before but i think your method is recommend if we got plenty java script to load.
btw, thx for the link =)

im just not sure, its w3c conform to put style tags below the </html> lol.

---

ego? fk off

CSS3 @font-face Rule

Learn to read before you post.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NubPro

ego? fk off

CSS3 @font-face Rule

Learn to read before you post.

---

no! YOU should learn to read before you post nab, i didnt say anything about your font-face comment. i was talking about your background comment noob: http://forum.ragezone.com/7001745-post10.html

ego? actually u got the ego here, fk you and stop quoting me when u cry about others.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VibeTribe

no! YOU should learn to read before you post nab, i didnt say anything about your font-face comment. i was talking about your background comment noob: http://forum.ragezone.com/7001745-post10.html

ego? actually u got the ego here, fk you and stop quoting me when u cry about others.

---

are you serious?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VibeTribe

u talk about nano seconds. would u even prefer not to use any comments just the file isnt that large to download then? pff

although, his method is easier to read and understand, specially for newbies.

---

is that really hard to be understand?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NubPro

are you serious?

---

yes

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NubPro

is that really hard to be understand?

---

no, but everybody begins small, and its the fact its better to read.
few mins ago u had other reasons to piss of me, u are just looking for hassle i guess.
jerk, just leave if u keep believing u are the pro and nobody else is that good like you.
suggestions are fine, but u act like the king and cant take criticism on your suggestions, so shut up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VibeTribe

yes


no, but everybody begins small, and its the fact its better to read.
few mins ago u had other reasons to piss of me, u are just looking for hassle i guess.
jerk, just leave if u keep believing u are the pro and nobody else is that good like you.
suggestions are fine, but u act like the king and cant take criticism on your suggestions, so shut up.

---

that's the criticism that I gave him, trying to make it simple and not wasting time to type all the shits codes.

Act like a king?
you have no idea who am I

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NubPro

that's the criticism that I gave him, trying to make it simple and not wasting time to type all the shits codes.

Act like a king?
you have no idea who am I

---

idc who u are, u got an ego, thats all i see right now.

NubPro, instead of this verbal fight with Vibe, why don't you explain to us how that code segment is, as you say, 'useless'?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VibeTribe

im just not sure, its w3c conform to put style tags below the </html> lol.

---

I didn't realise he put it below the </html> tag. It should be in the body tag, but below the content. If he put it below the </html> tag, then it definitely shouldn't be there.

I also found a better article to explain things. This one goes into more detail than Yahoo!'s page.

The best way to load external JavaScript | NCZOnline

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EliteGM

NubPro, instead of this verbal fight with Vibe, why don't you explain to us how that code segment is, as you say, 'useless'?

---

CSS3 @font-face Rule

so what?

Decent yet simple, good for a first web template anyways. Keep up the good work :D:

I don't see the problem? Just dumping a link here won't help?

He's filled out both required fields in his CSS, you could perhaps add some quotes to the src:url(''); bit, but it's far from useless, no? Enlighten us.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EliteGM

I don't see the problem? Just dumping a link here won't help?

He's filled out both required fields in his CSS, you could perhaps add some quotes to the src:url(''); bit, but it's far from useless, no? Enlighten us.

---

.ttf won't work in IE 8

Still doesn't explain how that makes it useless. It will have use for people NOT using IE. (Which is quite a lot of people these days)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Smitty

I didn't realise he put it below the </html> tag. It should be in the body tag, but below the content. If he put it below the </html> tag, then it definitely shouldn't be there.

I also found a better article to explain things. This one goes into more detail than Yahoo!'s page.

The best way to load external JavaScript | NCZOnline

---

well i already found out, its above the </body> tag. i even did some other stuff to improve my site im currently working on, so much thx for reminding me on that important topic. now i let my apache store images/css and scripts at u for a half year and i decide when i want to re-cache it at u via GET var on the image and script sources^^
also set the html cache to 1 second for news pages etc, expires module is very helpful at all.

actually that method u suggest i use for a java script that loads different hover images in a shop system, so thx to u ppl can look around the shop while the hover images are loading in the background. =D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NubPro

.ttf won't work in IE 8

---

maybe he gonna add oef later? its not useless nor wrong, its just not 100% compatible yet.