Should I release a simple vb.net launcher ?
Why I am asking this question;
So basically, all of the launchers are infected or they are shown as false positive..
So I am thinking about releasing a simple vb.net launcher which requires .NET Framework to launch, without auto-update or serialcheck.. I know that will be bullshit but atleast it can be useful for some users. It's a few lines of coding , which includes a web browser with few buttons.
Re: Should I release a simple vb.net launcher ?
If you're not gonna make it autoupdater, the best you could do is use VB 6.0, so you can get ridd of .NET requierement, you don't need .net for make an application that just opens an external executable...
P.s: You could use x1zmeng serialkey dll generator for the serial, just import the function to your source :).
Re: Should I release a simple vb.net launcher ?
>> Use launcher source found in source release, edit it to how you please
>> Change it to fit your needs
>> Stable customizable launcher with no false positives nor infection
o.o
Re: Should I release a simple vb.net launcher ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wucas
>> Use launcher source found in source release, edit it to how you please
>> Change it to fit your needs
>> Stable customizable launcher with no false positives nor infection
o.o
Yeh that's a good idea too, but if he wants to code himself one using Visual Basic, then just let him do it :), will be his decision btw.
Re: Should I release a simple vb.net launcher ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
adz28
Yeh that's a good idea too, but if he wants to code himself one using Visual Basic, then just let him do it :), will be his decision btw.
Yah, I wasn't trying to stop him, I was just saying that there was an alternative to the virus-infested
ones all through the forums. If he still wants to make one, schweettt.