[JAVA] HeaderObfuscate (ID List Protection) - Prevent those pesky leechers!

HeaderObfuscate
Preventing people using your headers!

Introduction

Hello. You ever want to update your Habbo server, but it requires getting new headers. You know people will take your work for granted and use them headers for yourself. Well I have the solution for you!

And yes, you can still decode it but it's meant to make it unreadable and prevent others from using your work!

You can make the headers unreadable, from this;

http://i.imgur.com/1x21Z.png

To this;

http://i.imgur.com/Nzmdq.png

Features

• Amazingly automatic
• Keeps field names
• Makes headers unreadable by the human eyes

How to use

Download the program, open up /files/header_class.java

Paste the class you have all the headers in (keep the class name, imports if you wish, it doesn't matter)

Paste your class in. Open RUN.bat and it should say how many headers it parsed, once finished open up header_output.java then replace all the field names with that class.

Remember to backup your old header class!

Images of a successful run

http://i.imgur.com/WeRWa.pnga

Download

Right here!

Well done, Alex.. You finally found a way to stop Cobe from robbing your headers! ;)

This is just fucking awesome but not enough to stop cobe :p

Do you really think I need you? lol

http://cobem.net/ss/oon6H3.png

I wasn't stealing your headers, you begged me to use them when I told you Me & Zak packetlogged a client. Nonetheless Grizzly has been far advanced compared to Sierra even IF I was using your headers(sad init?)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Makarov

Do you really think I need you? lol

http://cobem.net/ss/oon6H3.png

I wasn't stealing your headers, you begged me to use them when I told you Me & Zak packetlogged a client. Nonetheless Grizzly has been far advanced compared to Sierra even IF I was using your headers(sad init?)

---

You actually wanted them because you had Windows 8 and the packetlogger didn't work. Anywhore, it's a joke.

Calm your tits.

Sh4rp always worked, since when couldn't I log? That was a sorry excuse.

Your not actually using that revision however. Anyway, like I said, it was a joke. I'm flattered that you use my headers xo

I just created this because I was bored and I care about other developments :P:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Quackster

Your not actually using that revision however. Anyway, like I said, it was a joke. I'm flattered that you use my headers xo

I just created this because I was bored and I care about other developments :P:

---

I wouldn't say this is useless!

@Makarov

Calm your tits lol (LittleJ's current packetlogger should work anyway)

Some people assume I'm dependant on him, not true :P

But is possible to decode or need a algorithm to decode? Aaaaand you have this algorithm :P

Decompiled the .jar, now I will analyse to try to decode :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jomp16

But is possible to decode or need a algorithm to decode? Aaaaand you have this algorithm :P

Decompiled the .jar, now I will analyse to try to decode :)

---

It's possible to decode it. Just makes it harder to read, that's what obfuscation means. I've written a dobfuscator for it myself :)

Reversing deobfuscating? Lol?
Anyways, looking good :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tha

Reversing deobfuscating? Lol?
Anyways, looking good :)

---

Obfuscate:

Code:

---

Render obscure, unclear, or unintelligible.

---

Deobfuscate:

Code:

---

To deobfuscate is to convert a program that is difficult to understand into one that is simple.

---

I know how my program works :)

After giving it a test with the provided example file I found it simply generated broken code...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cecer1

After giving it a test with the provided example file I found it simply generated broken code...

---

Hang on I broke it :):

Edit: Fixed the bug!

I thought that the reason why people release emulators with source is because they want to educate and encourage others on developing their own emulators? So why make a part of your source unreadable? Every emulator should be 100% open source so people could learn from them and use the information provided on making their own emulators.

There are many people who are displeased by the fact that there are too many emulator renames. If we would want to have new emulators, we would need to share our information for others. Selfishness is only making it worse. I've also heard that getting these headers is relatively easy so I don't really see the point in all of this.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Daim

I thought that the reason why people release emulators with source is because they want to educate and encourage others on developing their own emulators? So why make your source unreadable? Every emulator should be 100% open source so people could learn from them and use the information provided on making their own emulators.

There are many people who are displeased by the fact that there are too many emulator renames. If we would want to have new emulators, we would need to share our information for others. Selfishness is only making it worse. I've also heard that getting these headers is relatively easy so I don't really see the point in all of this.

---

This only makes one class unreadable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Quackster

This only makes one class unreadable.

---

Sorry. It's now corrected.

Reload ids from swf not take me even 15 minutes.

I think something more useful would be a tool to encrypt those ASASM files that can be extracted from SWFs, and view IPs.

LOL ASASM LMAO LMAO

WHAT AN UNFORTUNATE FILE NAME LOL

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FullmetalPride

I think something more useful would be a tool to encrypt those ASASM files that can be extracted from SWFs, and view IPs.

LOL ASASM LMAO LMAO

WHAT AN UNFORTUNATE FILE NAME LOL

---

I think you mean RABCDAsm?

Anyway, looking good Alex, nice release!

They look like base64 encoded headers (not the one we use for habbo, but a standard one you'd see in C#). Anyway, I don't actually get the use of this, they will just put in the headers they need for themselves rendering this useless, I mean it's a decent initiative but what's the point. I thought we were an open-source community not Aaron 2.0

Thanks, Nice release. But don't need this.

Anyways, its just a simple number encrypted in base64 twice :P

But all obfuscation fails. Everything obfuscated has one flaw: It is able to be runned. If a program can run, it can be reverse engineered... :P

If it can't be reverse engineered, it cant be ran. As simple as that

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sean

I think you mean RABCDAsm?

Anyway, looking good Alex, nice release!

---

No that's a utility asasm is a file type ActionScript Assembly