Probably not. The framework is capable of easily moving to another revision, you just have to change the packet ids, and maybe some logic.
Type: Posts; User: TheAJ
Probably not. The framework is capable of easily moving to another revision, you just have to change the packet ids, and maybe some logic.
SheenBR I suggest you download the zip file from here: http://jolte.codeplex.com/releases/view/88914
@Caustik the source tree hasn't been updated in a long time, and Jolt v2 has a totally...
I don't follow development of Habbo anymore, but decided to stop by and see how people are moving forward since I last seen it. But seriously, is it just me, or is everyone focusing more on the...
It's been dead for a long time now...
The main reason (in my opinion) why it's dead, is because the whole community expects developers to finish stuff for them. Most developers will try their best...
I'm pretty sure this is because you are trying to run the client using a Java 1.7 runtime. Try using Java 1.6
I briefly checked out your code, it looks decent. Good luck with your project.
Hello, Me and MangiS have decided it is now time that we release Jolt v2 to the public. Please use this with respect to the developers of Jolt.
NO LONGER NEEDS MYSQL INSTALLATION! (Comes with...
I think you mean going through normal database design procedures of normalization and to eliminate multi-valued dependencies(0NF/UNF to 1NF), partial dependencies (1NF to 2NF), and transitive...
