Another signature.

[sys73m3rr0r]

Hey.

I made another signature, I tried making the image pop out if you know what i mean but the border is messed up :sq_yellow

 

[Rainwizzard]

Too big for a signature, and **** quality.... FAIL

 

[DaOdin]

The render is horrible.

 

[Leimone]

Yay the hacker's back <.<
okay ,well
this one is TO big,
also the background looks like you've dropping your camerar about 100 times, and then took a picture of trees,
and the renders is possible to find in google <.<

 

[xblackcat]

Way to big for a signature, hmm fail

 

[Laced]

Too big to be a signature.

Very bad quality.

And the render quality is freaking horrible.

0/10

 

[Flawz]

You guys, a part from Leimone who gave proper feedback are pure assholes.

And xblackcat from the looks of it you didn't even make the signature yourself so you don't belong in this conversation.

Not every beginner shines through, learn to give PROPER feedback and tips instead of attacking him by saying "fail".

 

[sys73m3rr0r]

Thanks Flawz

And... I know its too big as i said in the first post i just wanted to try the popping out of the picture effect

 

[Laced]

Thanks Flawz

And... I know its too big as i said in the first post i just wanted to try the popping out of the picture effect

Yeah we know, we're just saying you need to make it smaller, both the render and the canvas.

 

[sys73m3rr0r]

Yeah we know, we're just saying you need to make it smaller, both the render and the canvas.

Yeah, I didn't know what render to use so i just did a simpsons one :jump:

 

[sys73m3rr0r]

Is that a more reasonable size?

 

[scrat55]

well it could be even less, usualy the sigs are around 450x150px. so something around that will make the deal. well tahts the sizes i use anyways.

 

[CioNide]

It's a little better.

 

[sys73m3rr0r]

I usually use 400x100. :euro:

 

[Mreow]

You need to make smaller sigs, get better renders, and read tuts. 2.5/10

 

[Rainwizzard]

It's better, but the render still is low quality. Did the original render have a low quality spot, or was it just from cutting it out?

 

[sys73m3rr0r]

It's better, but the render still is low quality. Did the original render have a low quality spot, or was it just from cutting it out?

The original render had good quality it is just because the size of the render was like 700 height and 400 width, i resized it to fit my sig.

 

[Rainwizzard]

if you used CTRL+T and hold Shift, the quality doesn't diminish by that much.

 

[buzzfizz]

Lawl, its 50 cent.

V2 is better because you actually use the whole render since in V1, the render got out of the sig on the right side.

Though it will be better if its just the bg by itself.

 

[sys73m3rr0r]

Lawl, its 50 cent.

V2 is better because you actually use the whole render since in V1, the render got out of the sig on the right side.

Though it will be better if its just the bg by itself.

Thanks, i thought V2 was better thats why i moved the render more in.