NASA loses original Moon Landing footage

[theninjaway]

NASA has lost the original footage of man's first steps on the moon. Neil Armstrong's historic moment was seen by 600 million people in July 1969, but according to NASA the original tapes have been mislaid in their archives.

Source: http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Sky-News-Archive/Article/200806413537349

 

[Kyokyonos]

600 million people? I never knew.

 

[Wilsongb10]

Not only NASA have it because it might of been leaked earlier to the public.

 

[theninjaway]

Original Tapes, Wilson.

 

[troublemaker1111]

4:29pm UK, Monday August 14, 2006

 

[Batz]

4:29pm UK, Monday August 14, 2006

I lol'd.

 

[Horizon]

I'm one of those people that thinks Neil Armstrong never landed on the moon.

This just strengthens my belief.

 

[theninjaway]

I'm one of those people that thinks Neil Armstrong never landed on the moon.

This just strengthens my belief.

I also believe that, infact it's been debunked that they landed. Van Allen's to start off. Then the proof in the video and photographs. The fact that they said the flag was moving just cuz he rocked it had been debunked, because he's standing beside it and its still blowing.

 

[ChronoTrigger]

Right when the rumor says they didn't land on the moon really starts to get big, they suddenly "lose" it. How does NASA "lose" something that historic? Load of bull if you ask me.

 

[Ron]

check the studio they taped it in. I bet they left copies there just in case they were lost.

 

[Horizon]

I also believe that, infact it's been debunked that they landed. Van Allen's to start off. Then the proof in the video and photographs. The fact that they said the flag was moving just cuz he rocked it had been debunked, because he's standing beside it and its still blowing.

They also said that the stars couldn't be picked up because of the ship's lights. That's not possible because there is no atmosphere on the moon. They still would have shown.

 

[GrisoM]

They lose something that never happend

Thats a paradox right? LoL!

 

[troublemaker1111]

I also believe that, infact it's been debunked that they landed. Van Allen's to start off. Then the proof in the video and photographs. The fact that they said the flag was moving just cuz he rocked it had been debunked, because he's standing beside it and its still blowing.

actually it has been shown in many experiments that a flag does indeed move around in a vacuum
here's one for starters:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=yhab86KoVjU

They also said that the stars couldn't be picked up because of the ship's lights. That's not possible because there is no atmosphere on the moon. They still would have shown.

And this isn't the reason they gave for the lack of stars. The real reason is that the camera's exposure time was too fast to pick up any dim starlight. It had to be fast or the photographs would be too bright. remember there is no atmosphere to block the sun on the moon. You can try it here on earth if you want.

 

[CrashOveride]

I also believe that, infact it's been debunked that they landed. Van Allen's to start off. Then the proof in the video and photographs. The fact that they said the flag was moving just cuz he rocked it had been debunked, because he's standing beside it and its still blowing.

Everything I have seen as far as "proof" for either argument has been debunked and then the debunk "proof" has been debunked...

Can we all just agree that we'll never agree and strive forward as humankind instead of wasting time on the past?

They lose something that never happend

Thats a paradox right? LoL!

That actually makes you look a bit silly since it's "Tapes" they are talking about, doesn't matter whether the event is truthful or not...
Was going to make a comparison but I thought it'd be too mean =/

Crash

 

[troublemaker1111]

The whole moon hoax theory is completely ridiculous even at its lowest levels. It was in the middle of the cold war. The Russians had spies everywhere. They knew exactly what the USA was and wasn't capable of and grabbed any opportunity they could find to discredit them. But they didn't make any fuss about this? Come on now.

 

[Vendaku~Metal]

The whole moon hoax theory is completely ridiculous even at its lowest levels. It was in the middle of the cold war. The Russians had spies everywhere. They knew exactly what the USA was and wasn't capable of and grabbed any opportunity they could find to discredit them. But they didn't make any fuss about this? Come on now.

For the first and last time in history, we agree on the same thing.

For anyone who doubts we landed on the moon, watch the Mythbusters episode when they debunked the conspiracy theories on this. They did a hell of a job on it.

 

[Storm Watch]

That sir is extremely sad

 

[Robert]

For the first and last time in history, we agree on the same thing.

For anyone who doubts we landed on the moon, watch the Mythbusters episode when they debunked the conspiracy theories on this. They did a hell of a job on it.

Omg dude, you stole the exact post I was going to write.

I too finally agree with vannaroth on something, and yes that Mythbusters ep was epic. Before the ep I was almost sure it was a hoax, afterwards I was sure it was real.

 

[Ron]

Omg dude, you stole the exact post I was going to write.

I too finally agree with vannaroth on something, and yes that Mythbusters ep was epic. Before the ep I was almost sure it was a hoax, afterwards I was sure it was real.

http://www.megavideo.com/?v=Q0RHSY9N

 

[Ambrosiax]

I also believe that, infact it's been debunked that they landed. Van Allen's to start off. Then the proof in the video and photographs. The fact that they said the flag was moving just cuz he rocked it had been debunked, because he's standing beside it and its still blowing.

I was watching something about it where they said if they landed on the moon then the boosters from the shuttle would have blown away a lot of dirt on the surface and that he was moving way to fast.
So I don't really believe it either.

Forgot to add that it wasn't MythBusters though it was something else that was a bit more professional >.>