Please visit my website

Perfect layout. DTB's rite in sayin it needs more colour but if u do add sum don't over do it. Awesome apart from that
 
There is something wrong in the coding causing the scroll bar on the bottom to show up.

Search for this "<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="101%" border=0>" and replace it with this "<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0>"
That should remove it.
 
Np, let me know if there is something you don't know, i'm not html guru or anything, but i can most of the time figure things out.

You can also ask any kind of stuff over at XtremePcCentral.com you still got a account there, and there are lots of people who know all sort of things about html and all.
 
save top banner as an optimized gif :) will be much smoother

if you have any questions i'm here for you too ^^ i'm pretty good at webdesign
 
GohanSSJ said:
Yeah but gif files are limited in quality, best would be actually png.

This is a interesting read http://www.xtremepccentral.com/modules.php?s=&name=Sections&sop=viewarticle&artid=26&page=1
gif files are not limited in quality :) in fact, given the right image it's perfect quality ^^
png is just gif with more compression and supports transparancy i think o.O... cant remember... either way png may be better but i always use gif :) you can limit filesize enormously, not to mention no quality loss :P
 
NeoSparky said:
gif files are not limited in quality :) in fact, given the right image it's perfect quality ^^
png is just gif with more compression and supports transparancy i think o.O... cant remember... either way png may be better but i always use gif :) you can limit filesize enormously, not to mention no quality loss :P
Gif is limited to 256 colours, thus crap quality.

Also it's gif that supports transparency, i'm not sure about PNG on that.

I think your confused with JPG.

And the guy who wrote that knows lots and lots about this
 
GohanSSJ said:
Gif is limited to 256 colours, thus crap quality.

Also it's gif that supports transparency, i'm not sure about PNG on that.

I think your confused with JPG.

And the guy who wrote that knows lots and lots about this
he doesnt sound like it :tp: doesnt even mention what lossy/losless means (i think... tbh was not to the point, didnt read it all :tp: )
and i know well enough when to use jpg and when to use gif :)
fact remains that png is better, yet not a standard (yet) ^^
simply coz png = gif, just improved...

gif is limited to 256 colours, and is perfect for webdesign :)
it makes it's own colour table, using only the colours it needs, making it very compact
gif and jpg can't be compared... you dont save everything in either one of these two formats... you combine..
gif = lots of seemless spaces of the same colour
LOSLESS
jpg = photographs, complicated images (with lots of colour differentiation)
LOSSY
 
Last edited:
You say gif is perfect for webdesign, but if you want a nice logo then gif won't do the trick, it makes it look crap.

Png might not be standard, however it's supported by all browsers these days, and for example the upload of vB.

If you use a simple banner and all then gif is fine, but when you go for higher quality and all then you better go for PNG.

As for him not sounding like it... well i posted before work of him, his site is changed now and not everything is on it, but he is good, really good.
 
GohanSSJ said:
You say gif is perfect for webdesign, but if you want a nice logo then gif won't do the trick, it makes it look crap.

Png might not be standard, however it's supported by all browsers these days, and for example the upload of vB.

If you use a simple banner and all then gif is fine, but when you go for higher quality and all then you better go for PNG.

As for him not sounding like it... well i posted before work of him, his site is changed now and not everything is on it, but he is good, really good.
i kno
 
Back