- Joined
- Jul 6, 2013
- Messages
- 1,224
- Reaction score
- 506
I can see all of the votes, and no one has messed with the votes. There are a few votes that are unknown to me, but most are colored names.Exactly my thoughts, @Junkers!
By the way, I actually expected FCV2005 to get a lot more votes than it has now. I am a bit disappointed it does look like someone had been messing with the votes.
I hope there will be more to choose from next year. It should've gotten more promotion.I think @Biesmen was talking about the previous vote here: http://forum.ragezone.com/f119/vote-2016-ragezone-awards-userbar-1119782/ when he said "it does look like someone had been messing with the votes".
Anyw. now that I see Junkers awards, I agree that they look very similar to the last years designs. There were sadly only two submissions this year. Personally I just don't like the design of #1 and it looks like I'm not alone. We gotta play fair in the end.
I hope there will be more to choose from next year. It should've gotten more promotion.
Hehe trueQuite sure the problem is not the promotion, The Portfolio sections has been inactive for years and not many people care enough about the reward given nor want to make a userbar
Hehe true
I'm sure this would've helped though:
Or even this:
Why didnt you say that earlier XDDD than i would've done that
Quite sure the problem is not the promotion, The Portfolio sections has been inactive for years and not many people care enough about the reward given nor want to make a userbar