- Joined
- Mar 7, 2003
- Messages
- 5,747
- Reaction score
- 899
You must be registered to see links
I want one of them instead
Guess its just down to the software engineers now, electronic engineers own
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Also AMD is in the works of a high core CPU also that can do graphics.
so is IBM and why would we need 80 cores? what happened to quantum computers.
Only certain computing tasks can be parallelised... and by that, I don't mean 'most of them'. Most others still need sequential execution.
I'd rather they build one ultrafast core instead of many slower ones.
What I'm saying is, why don't they focus on making a faster single core, and then multiply that by two or four? :smile:
Thought quad had been out for ages? Atleast for servers o.0?
Thought quad had been out for ages? Atleast for servers o.0?
So obvious you don't read before posting. Spam is not appreciated here and I'll infarct you if you do it again.
NoPeace - out
Yeah that's what Intel did with the Core archecture.
A low clocked Core Solo blows away most higher clocked CPU's. Then with the Core Duo they added another core. The Core 2 Duo improved on the archecture to make it even more efficient and then added another 2 cores core the Core 2 Quads.
So yes they are making a single core vastly faster. Might not reflect it in hertz but they are highly efficient and can they can do more work pre cycle.
Hopefully with the next AMD's there'll be more efficiency and the Core 3's will be even more efficient.
Also you have Sony/IBM's Cell processor. The second revision of it is now yeilding 6ghz off a 65nm processor. Not to metion that CPU is 8-way.
Hopefully thoes move over to the desktop market sooner then latter. Would really put AMD and Intel to shame.
NoPeace - out
Not quite. Your thinking of quad CPU's not quad core. Servers would have four actual processors on four separate die whereas quad core is four on one die.
Don't be so hard on him NoPeace he just wants to learn like the rest of us.
You don't have to be such a meanie nopeace, I don't like hardware, i don't build hardware and YES i did read the entire thing before posting.
Not everyone is as good as you think you are.
Cells have next to no support. Sure they are good for super computers. i hear atleast one is being refitted with them. But for the general market i cant see them taking off. They have only just started giving them out to universitys for them to start developing stuff for them, by the time the cell is truely ready to be launched intel and AMD will have better kit...
Which makes sense considering sony is too busy wasting money on the PS and rootkits to splash it at the engineers. Intel and AMD spend billions to keep up with moores law, i cant see sony being as dedicated.