No, He was completely away from the constitution, insulting the president in media is always wrong, you can say whatever you want in just a good way but they didn't and even though he never closed a tv channel etc ..
Islamic Sharia is always the main resource of legislation here. Now, Before, Later. Nobody objected to it.
He made himself immune completely from the law ( just for 2 days only ) because the decisions the president had refused the Supreme Constitutional Court and that there was a case to isolate President Ali though he's elected by the people and there were international monitoring of the elections.
Freedom of the press should be absolute, to the point of insulting individual, normal, people. Calling a president bad for instance is perfectly fine, it's an opinion that the entity, the newspaper, has and is fine if they provide reasons and a balanced argument. There should never, ever ever ever, be a legal reason why a newspaper cannot report on an opinion if it states reasons and arguments for that opinion. I'd hope it is peer reviewed within a company so it's not completely the opinion of one person, but even if it is, if they provide reasons I think any intelligent people will poke the holes in the logic. You just have to remember news is opinion based, not fact. If you want to read about facts, go read a science study or a news service based on facts.
As for your main source of legislation being religious law, how the hell can you tell me that is fair on none Islams. Like I said before, religion has no place in government, and as soon as it does it's going to be corrupted. Frankly it saddens me that your party system is based on religion. Religion is a powerful tool to manipulate the masses for individuals to wield large amounts of power. I can't see voting being particularly balanced in any Islamic country where one party is affiliated with a religion.
International oversight is pretty important tbh. Just because a country chooses a leader, doesn't mean the rest of the world will agree with that choice, or support that leader. Frankly it just goes to show how the perspectives of the citizens of different countries are so different.
No, He was completely away from the constitution, insulting the president in media is always wrong, you can say whatever you want in just a good way but they didn't and even though he never closed a tv channel etc ..
Islamic Sharia is always the main resource of legislation here. Now, Before, Later. Nobody objected to it.
He made himself immune completely from the law ( just for 2 days only ) because the decisions the president had refused the Supreme Constitutional Court and that there was a case to isolate President Ali though he's elected by the people and there were international monitoring of the elections.
Freedom of the press should be absolute, to the point of insulting individual, normal, people. Calling a president bad for instance is perfectly fine, it's an opinion that the entity, the newspaper, has and is fine if they provide reasons and a balanced argument. There should never, ever ever ever, be a legal reason why a newspaper cannot report on an opinion if it states reasons and arguments for that opinion. I'd hope it is peer reviewed within a company so it's not completely the opinion of one person, but even if it is, if they provide reasons I think any intelligent people will poke the holes in the logic. You just have to remember news is opinion based, not fact. If you want to read about facts, go read a science study or a news service based on facts.
As for your main source of legislation being religious law, how the hell can you tell me that is fair on none Islams. Like I said before, religion has no place in government, and as soon as it does it's going to be corrupted. Frankly it saddens me that your party system is based on religion. Religion is a powerful tool to manipulate the masses for individuals to wield large amounts of power. I can't see voting being particularly balanced in any Islamic country where one party is affiliated with a religion.
International oversight is pretty important tbh. Just because a country chooses a leader, doesn't mean the rest of the world will agree with that choice, or support that leader. Frankly it just goes to show how the perspectives of the citizens of different countries are so different.
