Anti-packet database

[PinkGatsby]

i never said i supported nanoTime over that. i just said that this was inaccurate

First and second point were for you, third was for the guy above.

 

[PEing for noobs]

Nice Deagan. Hopefully it'll kill most packet editors.

^^

 

[flav]

Do you have a fix for that double clicking NPC = dc thing?
Would love if you had that

MapleCharacter.java
Add

    private long lastNPCTalk;

    public long getLastNPCTalk() {
        return lastNPCTalk;
    }

    public void setLastNPCTalk() {
        lastNPCTalk = System.currentTimeMillis();
    }

NPCTalkHandler.java
Add

        if (c.getPlayer().getLastNPCTalk() > System.currentTimeMillis() - 500)
            return;
        else
            c.getPlayer().setLastNPCTalk();

Under

MapleMapObject obj = c.getPlayer().getMap().getMapObject(oid);

You can change the delay of 500 milli seconds if you feel like but it seems to be fine.

 

[Deagan ツ]

MapleCharacter.java
Add

    private long lastNPCTalk;

    public long getLastNPCTalk() {
        return lastNPCTalk;
    }

    public void setLastNPCTalk() {
        lastNPCTalk = System.currentTimeMillis();
    }

NPCTalkHandler.java
Add

        if (c.getPlayer().getLastNPCTalk() > System.currentTimeMillis() - 500)
            return;
        else
            c.getPlayer().setLastNPCTalk();

Under

MapleMapObject obj = c.getPlayer().getMap().getMapObject(oid);

You can change the delay of 500 milli seconds if you feel like but it seems to be fine.

Why not just a public long lastNPCTalk =0; or even the same latestUse I use in every spam patch?
Oh and i'm not sure weither that would fix it as I don't know what the actual caus eof the dc is.
Personally I didn't have any problems with npc's but if anyone could give me the packets that were sent at the point of dc'ing, I would be able to have a closer look. for now imma just assume flav's fix work.

Nice Deagan. Hopefully it'll kill most packet editors.

^^

Oh btw blue gave me that one packet.

if (name.equals("FuckTheAdmin")) { //hurhur =D
            c.getPlayer().ban("Autoban for Pat. fucktheadmin?", true);
}

 

[watzmename]

You DC from NPCs when it opens twice.

 

[Deagan ツ]

You DC from NPCs when it opens twice.

Is it even possible to open a npc twice, when it's already open I can't.

 

[lolxd]

Why not just a public long lastNPCTalk =0; or even the same latestUse I use in every spam patch?
Oh and i'm not sure weither that would fix it as I don't know what the actual caus eof the dc is.
Personally I didn't have any problems with npc's but if anyone could give me the packets that were sent at the point of dc'ing, I would be able to have a closer look. for now imma just assume flav's fix work.



Oh btw blue gave me that one packet.

if (name.equals("FuckTheAdmin")) { //hurhur =D
            c.getPlayer().ban("Autoban for Pat. fucktheadmin?", true);
}

Flav's fix works fine, if you know what privates and publics are.

 

[Deagan ツ]

Flav's fix works fine, if you know what privates and publics are.

I never said it didn't. I just asked why he went for the private and then made it public with that function.

 

[Samus.]

Very nice deagan, that will brings some life into the Maple section.

 

[Deagan ツ]

Very nice deagan, that will brings some life into the Maple section.

I don't think most members in this section even know what this release does, but yeah I was hoping to do so thanks.

 

[Buya]

interesting.
thanks for the fixes

 

[Jiyure]

Thanks for the Release Deagan.
Hopefully we will see less Packet editors with this

 

[rice]

Good job deagan!

 

[Deagan ツ]

interesting.
thanks for the fixes

Np

Thanks for the Release Deagan.
Hopefully we will see less Packet editors with this

True, I seriously HATE people who ruin the fun of others, unless that person deserved it.

Good job deagan!

Lolhi rice.

 

[PinkGatsby]

I never said it didn't. I just asked why he went for the private and then made it public with that function.

Because it increases flexibility, maintainability, understandability and it's conventional. Yes making public variables could be easier for you, but it'd be harder for people, who follow your footsteps, to understand what you're trying to achieve.

 

[Deagan ツ]

Because it increases flexibility, maintainability, understandability and it's conventional. Yes making public variables could be easier for you, but it'd be harder for people, who follow your footsteps, to understand what you're trying to achieve.

I see, let me make some edits in my own source, loool.

 

[PEing for noobs]

Bump

 

[Deagan ツ]

Bump

Thanks pat, also, about to add your storage packets.

[3D 00] [05] [01 00] [85 84 1E 00] [02 00]
[3D 00] [07] [some int]

*edit* done added patches.

 

[.:LastBreath:.]

Love this release very helpful thanks again...

 

[Deagan ツ]

Love this release very helpful thanks again...

No problem. bump./