II_SYS_SYS code limit

[fake]

Does anyone know where the limit for codes beginning with II_SYS_SYS in defineitem.h can be increased? I'm having a problem because I seem to have exceeded the limit for new codes.

 

[Zacks]

What makes you say that? I don’t recall there being any limit in defineobj. In propmover, yes I did notice a limit when we upgraded from v15 to v16 for monsters, defineworld etc . Do you have any more detailed info on that?

 

[fake]

What makes you say that? I don’t recall there being any limit in defineobj. In propmover, yes I did notice a limit when we upgraded from v15 to v16 for monsters, defineworld etc . Do you have any more detailed info on that?

I'm saying this because I've been adding new codes for fashion, and I'm having an issue in the game where I have to take off and put on the fashion so someone else can see it, and in the error logs, I get this:


2025/ 7/16 11:29:08 Parts Not Property = 26

2025/ 7/16 11:29:08 Parts Not Property = 27

2025/ 7/16 11:29:08 Parts Not Property = 28

2025/ 7/16 11:29:08 Parts Not Property = 29

Now I tried changing those codes for old codes that already exist, and the problem with the fashion doesn't happen.

 

[Zacks]

When you look at the function, it shows that
pItemElem-&GetProp() returns NULL, which means the object is instantiated but doesn't point to any "ItemProp" defined in PropItem.txt or an equivalent.


Try modifying the function with:

if( pItemProp == NULL )
{
Error( "Parts Not Property = %d, ItemId = %d", i, pItemElem->m_dwItemId );
}

m_dwItemId

information than that — which source are you working on?

I think you made a mistake somewhere

 

[fake]

When you look at the function, it shows that
pItemElem-&GetProp() returns NULL, which means the object is instantiated but doesn't point to any "ItemProp" defined in PropItem.txt or an equivalent.


Try modifying the function with:

if( pItemProp == NULL )
{
Error( "Parts Not Property = %d, ItemId = %d", i, pItemElem->m_dwItemId );
}

m_dwItemId

information than that — which source are you working on?

I think you made a mistake somewhere

I'm working on my own font, which was updated a long time ago from v15 to v19.

I did what you told me, but I didn't get any error logs. Here's a screenshot.

These are the real codes of the fashion. When I change them for other old ones that already exist, I don't get this problem.

#define II_ARM_M_CHR_SHADEHAT 66225
#define II_ARM_M_CHR_SHADESUIT 66226
#define II_ARM_M_CHR_SHADEGLOVES 66227
#define II_ARM_M_CHR_SHADESHOES 66228

 

[Zacks]

66225 ?
Did you try lowering the ID? 66225 seems a bit high to me

 

[fake]

66225 ?
Did you try lowering the ID? 66225 seems a bit high to me

Yes, that's the only way for it to work, but now I can't set low codes because it would interfere with the other codes. That's why I want to know where the limit for those codes can be increased.

 

[Zacks]

Nothing will interfere with your code unless you use the same ID twice. Try using a much lower ID.
As a random example, search for '25555' in Visual Studio or Notepad++. If that ID doesn't exist, modify it. Why would it interfere with other systems? It's just equipment, lol

 

[fake]

Nothing will interfere with your code unless you use the same ID twice. Try using a much lower ID.
As a random example, search for '25555' in Visual Studio or Notepad++. If that ID doesn't exist, modify it. Why would it interfere with other systems? It's just equipment, lol

I mean, I'm talking about not having space to use low codes since they're all being used by other items.

 

[Zacks]

Yes, you just have to check if the ID you chose is already used by searching for it in your file only. CTRL + F —> it literally takes less than 10 seconds

 

[fake]

Yes, you just have to check if the ID you chose is already used by searching for it in your file only. CTRL + F —> it literally takes less than 10 seconds

All the codes are being used from 21 to 66279, that's why I can't use lower codes since they are being taken by other items. My flyff has been online for almost 8 years xD, that's why I urgently need to increase the limit of defineitem.h codes.