- Joined
- Sep 19, 2009
- Messages
- 138
- Reaction score
- 92
That's funny because I've seen a couple of things he's posted regarding his source such as the new Packet Handling system(which is worse in my opinion).
For packet handling I would prefer creating a Map object for that rather than an array.
Code:Map<Short, AbstractMaplePacketHandler> m = new HashMap<Short, AbstractMaplePacketHandler>();
Of course, that's just me...
That method was by me, although I have no idea how you've optimized it already.
If you are using hashmap instead of packet processor, there wont be any difference in it.
Last edited:

