Junior Spellweaver
- Joined
- May 14, 2011
- Messages
- 174
- Reaction score
- 325
About those packet structures, don't just take them from Snowlight. There might be ones that are really incomplete/wrong. I suggest using AS3 sorcerer to get the AS3 scripts to get the structures yourself.
But well, good luck I suppose, but we already got tons of R63 OLD CRYPTO (what people like to call R63a) emulators.
Who wants access to the source: Just send me a pm. It's still in development.
Everbody who has access to it can send pull requests to me so I can accept them (if everythings right)
If you got the link to the source don't post it on the forum. I'm gonna upload a TODO list tomorrow.
I never said that I'll sell the server, I just said that I'll sell a special membership for IDK users.
Thanks to Snowlight (Meth0d) for the well structured packet structures.
Ah, I forgot to say: Changed the server again to R63A cuz there were many users and friends who don't think good about the new version.
Cheers,
Steve Winfield
Would've been great if you added javadoc comments to your source. (steffchef)
I was PM'ing you, and since your box is full I'm going to say for you here:
I was thinking about that you should make an R63B, but with old ui, that's why:
Since you are stuck between R63a/b, you should use R63B with Old UI, that would have pretty much about the same User Interface as Phoenix. New UI is complicated indeed for new users (as beta was for new users too, it is just a matter of time).
With R63B, depending of the version, before new ui, you can add Groups creation inside client and Bots, 2 important things that users like, and it makes life simplified.
I'm porting currently IDK for R63B, old ui, because I really don't appreciate new ui too much.
yes, I still need to send user perks and rest of flat connection, but 80% of messenger is done, and navigator 10%.
Best of Luck, Steve, and please, consider that.
Indeed yes, sorry. Players. I mean it's just what the community is used to. However I guess it wouldn't be hard to port a cms over to players. However some people do not know how. It's completely up to you. Your doing a great job!
Indeed yes, sorry. Players. I mean it's just what the community is used to. However I guess it wouldn't be hard to port a cms over to players. However some people do not know how. It's completely up to you. Your doing a great job!
There is like a 4 post argument over how SQL tables should be titled, who gives a poop.
There is like a 4 post argument over how SQL tables should be titled, who gives a poop.
Nobody was arguing we are just discussing how tables are. Lunaa do you have skype?Nobody. I'm just giving my opinion. And I don't think anyone would 'give a poop' about your comment. But now let's get back ontopic since I can't afford another infraction.
Nobody was arguing we are just discussing how tables are. Lunaa do you have skype?
Yep, seems like it's dead because I posted nothing.. eh.. 5 days?Thread Dead? :/
Yep, seems like it's dead because I posted nothing.. eh.. 5 days?
I am on holiday.
Cheers,
Steve Winfield