Like I've said, I don't know the full story but calling me a backstabber when you yourself have done the same, money or not. I've already spoken with AuroX and have cleared all rumors, he only wish I asked for his permission before selling ChickenMS their source. Still it's a penis move on my part either way.
Which is exactly why you're an idiot especially when I just explained it. Can you not read? Or do you read what you only want to? The situations are completely different mainly because you made money off of something that wasn't your work to begin with. My point: I did not sell his source to one of the biggest faggots in the MapleStory community, whereas you did. I also did not force Moogra to release his source due to the fact that a lot of people had it (and in my case no one had the source I gave to my "
friend" besides himself), whereas you did. You see a trend? Who has done the more wrong? Please keep playing it off, you are so adorable I can't stand it.
"Rumors": I think I'm going to call them facts mainly because there is no coherent reason the rest of these servers have upgraded besides someone giving/selling them a source. Which, compelling evidence suggests that you are responsible.
Not to mention, knowing full well it was a penis move, why did you do it? You betray the trust of your friend to make a quick buck off him. That is pathetic, and that is also why you are a "backstabber" in my book.
I am not exactly sure why I have to defend my case especially when my "backstabbing" was merely due to a miscommunication between Moogra and myself (mainly because it was never specified or implied that the source was not to be distributed to friends for private usage - I never intended on him opening a server for anyone besides our circle of friends). Moogra then found out my "
friend" was using his source for a server and told him to shut down as well as delete his copy of the source. He did, and it was over, or so I thought: they essentially scapegoated me for anything that happened with the source afterwards. Anything that happened to the source afterwards was not by my hands. In fact, it got leaked multiple times to people with higher revision builds than I had ever gotten, and regardless of that I still got blamed. Your comparison isn't even valid mainly because of the
money aspect, and that is the entire focus of this. Whether or not you continue to play this fact off will decide whether or not I feel you are worth my time replying to.
Could you message me on MSN and tell me who's telling you that I'm working for Myth? It's been bugging me when I'm barely even in the MS scene.
ps: Never claimed anything was my work?
I would prefer my references remain anonymous, since frankly: it is none of your business from whom I get information from.
Also, that claim was based upon:
Anyway, for those who've bought the v112.4 source from Expedia (Up to Rev 11x), its up to you, if you want to release it or not, I don't mind, as long as credits are there. It seemed that he claimed everything was done by himself, from what I heard from someone. I'm not sure whether this is true or not, but w.e.
He recently modified his post of course. My grounds were based upon what was stated.
Regardless of that, you still decided to indirectly prove one of my points.