Working MuGuard Source

[zolamu]

too old

 

[Gembrid]

Re: [Release] Working MuGuard Source

approved

 

[ElemenT01]

Re: [Release] Working MuGuard Source

finally someone do something usefull for mu.

 

[Sartigan]

Re: [Release] Working MuGuard Source

talk to me on msn bro

 

[c4cadvisor]

Re: [Release] Working MuGuard Source

very nice, finally a good anti hack release. Does it block port sniffers?

 

[clamp]

Re: [Release] Working MuGuard Source

nice very good

 

[Gembrid]

Re: [Release] Working MuGuard Source

very nice, finally a good anti hack release. Does it block port sniffers?

good, but easy to bypass =(

 

[fenix010203]

Re: [Release] Working MuGuard Source

Hook Main ?

 

[flamingboy]

Re: [Release] Working MuGuard Source

hey boy, maybe it works in season II mains?

 

[Shatter]

Re: [Release] Working MuGuard Source

very nice, finally a good anti hack release. Does it block port sniffers?

it does, if you add the sniffer packets to it

good, but easy to bypass =(

not if you bundle the dll to the main, encrypt it and then make checksum - atleast none lame ass hackers wont try :

OFFTOP: you should make [Release] Working MiniMap Source xD

 

[zolamu]

Re: [Release] Working MuGuard Source

good, but easy to bypass =(

yea but if we inject it into the main it should be good..


here is download :

To view the content, you need to sign in or register

it works for any main
i just need to Load the dll using LoadLibrayA
and find the Loaded Proc using GetProcAddress..

 

[Gembrid]

Re: [Release] Working MuGuard Source

protection uses user mode api to get process list, there are severel tools that can hide any program from user mode apis, so target hack program won't be visible for dll, even if it's encrypted \=

 

[fenix010203]

Re: [Release] Working MuGuard Source

Please Put A guide to how the DLL Hook

Plzzzzzz

Nice MuGuard Please guide


Compiler VS 2005 ?

 

[alpg04]

Re: [Release] Working MuGuard Source

How i configure this:

char* Temp = GetCommandLine();
    if(Temp[9] != 0x63)
    {
       MessageBoxA(0,"Please use lancher.","MuGuard V1.0 by leo123",0);
       ExitProcess(0);
    }

What is "Temp[9]"?? I dont understand GetCommandLine, Temp[9].

 

[RedMG]

Re: [Release] Working MuGuard Source

I think it's good.

 

[zolamu]

Re: [Release] Working MuGuard Source

protection uses user mode api to get process list, there are severel tools that can hide any program from user mode apis, so target hack program won't be visible for dll, even if it's encrypted \=

yea , hmmm maybe we can code a function that use ASM to get list of running programs ?
anyway you want help me to make some good AntiHack ?

How i configure this:

char* Temp = GetCommandLine();
    if(Temp[9] != 0x63)
    {
       MessageBoxA(0,"Please use lancher.","MuGuard V1.0 by leo123",0);
       ExitProcess(0);
    }

What is "Temp[9]"?? I dont understand GetCommandLine, Temp[9].

it's chakge 'c' char of "connect" string it i code for freind he just wanted that only lancher be able to run the program you can delete this is function if you dont need it :scared:

Please Put A guide to how the DLL Hook

Plzzzzzz

Nice MuGuard Please guide


Compiler VS 2005 ?

i used VS 6.0 because in vs 2008 and 2005 need some packges..

 

[7770988]

Re: [Release] Working MuGuard Source

link is dead

 

[Gembrid]

Re: [Release] Working MuGuard Source

yea , hmmm maybe we can code a function that use ASM to get list of running programs ?
anyway you want help me to make some good AntiHack ?

i'd like too, but it's not asm, or C problem,
the problem is in lack of knowledges,
good antihack = good rootkit, that protects process in ring3 and in ring0(user mode and kernel mode), so good antihack protection must begin with rootkit writing guides =)

anyway, even if you will write a good rootkit, you will meet another problem, cryptography, you can have the best rootkit, but you will have to check the presence of it on server side, here you will need knowledges of cryptography or at least you will have to know how to work with 3rd party libraries

another thing, public antihacks are easy to bypass, because you know how they work + if many server uses it, someone that will create a bypassing tool - will work on other servers

so the question - is it worth to spend a lot of time for things that will be bypassed in a week =)
anyway it's interesting to learn smth new, for example kernel mode programming by i don't feel that it's time for me for learning it

+ all client side protection can be bypassed

so conclusion is in writing a server side protections, finding holes, mistakes and fix it, so noone will be able to by pass it, cause everything is controled on server side

Server Side Protection - Base, Main Protection
Client Side Protection - additional, helper =)

that's what i think =)

 

[zolamu]

Re: [Release] Working MuGuard Source

when you say sever said what u mean ?
main send to server process list ? or what xD
or server send packet to check is is there exist 3rd tool ?
or for example how can ServerSide know if the main use WPE PRO or someting ?:?:

 

[navossoc]

Re: [Release] Working MuGuard Source

when you say sever said what u mean ?
main send to server process list ? or what xD
or server send packet to check is is there exist 3rd tool ?
or for example how can ServerSide know if the main use WPE PRO or someting ?:?:

Server = Mu Server = Where you clients can't get access.

It's possible do something like this, btw already exists gameguard.

The server don't know when is the main or the wpe sending packets.
So? Fix the server! (FIX THE BUGS IN MUSERVER)

[]'s